How to Detect Parental Alienation Syndrome and What to Do About It

Normalizing - 2016

De facto judges, CPS and Family Court Staff workers are operating a state sanctioned kidnapping racket [RICO]. These predators operating under the color of law are kidnapping our children and seniors for money. They demoralize and destroy the developing mind of our children during their most tender years and our vulnerable parents during their twilight years turning the beginning and end of their lives into nightmares, leaving shattered and distraught families in their wake.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Because our elected and appointed servants refuse to protect and champion our most precious and hallowed resource, our children, We the People through the Unified United States Common Law Grand Jury will champion this holy cause with a relentless determination to bring justice upon these wicked stewards. We Promise!Fathers and Family Courts - 2015

We are a proactive group with the tenacity and motivation to stop these criminals that have seized our courts. It you have an issue with CPS, APS, Family Court and Juvenile Court and you like to join our class action suit and help stop the destruction of our children and families contact an intake receptionists below and begin the process. Let the receptionist know if you can volunteer time to help this cause.

There are many proponents of the Fathers Rights Movement that profess a belief in the teachings and sayings of Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King. Yet when you delve into their knowledge of the practices of Gandhi and King you find that they have only scratched the surface when studying the methods of these two leaders. AFLA - Ghandi - 2015Gandhi set forth a very specific template of actions in order persuade the British to leave India. Despite the fact that he made incredibly moving speeches to persuade his opponents it was the actions of his followers that drove his point home. Gandhi believed that if he could not persuade you he would find someone else that could. This was achieved by the economic boycott of the British monopolies on salt and cloth. Gandhi didn’t hesitate to put thousands of Englishmen out of work. It was the discontent of these out of work Englishmen that convinced the British Government to concede defeat.

So why Florida Orange Juice and California Wine?

It should be evident to anyone the value of these agricultural commodities to each state. California reaps over $1 billion a year from its wine industry. Florida spends millions promoting orange juice and tourism. Yet neither state gives a damn about the rights of a divorced father! In keeping with the boycotts of British salt, cloth, the Birmingham bus companies and the white own businesses of the segregated South we are instituting a worldwide boycott of Florida Orange Juice, California Wine and their Theme Parks.

If these states are prepared to ignore the voices of so many disenfranchised fathers then they will surely listen to the complaints and pain of their growers and corporate theme park owners.

So join us as we spread the pain and suffering of our Children and Fathers across the entire States of Florida and California. Remember once these states fall and grant Fathers’ Equal Rights and Equal Custody this boycott will be shifted to other deserving states such as Vermont, Michigan, Minnesota, Virginia and the many other states that turn their backs on the Rights of Fathers and the Happiness of our Children.Childrens Rights Florida

Add a reason why others should support this campaign by sharing your: photo  video  story  article

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

 A short clip from my documentary about Parental Alienation. I never employed a script during the filming of this process. It was quite unnecessary. I remembered everything very well; like a fresh wound.

Fight Family Courts - 2015

Parental Abduction is Child Abuse

Parental Alienation Syndrome: How to Detect It and What to Do About It

by J. Michael Bone and Michael R. Walsh

FLORIDA BAR JOURNAL, VOL. 73, No. 3, MARCH 1999, p 44-48

Although parental alienation syndrome (PAS) is a familiar term, there is still a great deal of confusion and unclarity about its nature, dimensions, and, therefore, its detection.(1) Its presence, however, is unmistakable. In a longitudinal study of 700 “high conflict” divorce cases followed over 12 years, it was concluded that elements of PAS are present in the vast majority of the samples.(2) Diagnosis of PAS is reserved for mental health professionals who come to the court in the form of expert witnesses. Diagnostic hallmarks usually are couched in clinical terms that remain vague and open to interpretation and, therefore. susceptible to argument pro and con by opposing experts. The phenomenon of one parent turning the child against the…

View original post 3,477 more words

The Parental Alienation Debate and Argument for Tort

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Parental alienation is a growing problem faced by the courts — a problem which deserves a better remedy than currently exists. Parental alienation (PA), insofar as this paper is concerned, is defined as the unreasonable or irrational rejection of a parent by a child primarily due to the “negative influence of the other parent.”1

In a previous article, this author discussed the balancing interests of the fundamental constitutional protection of the right of a parent to raise a child as s/he sees fit, and the failure of Courts to protect the interests of an unreasonably rejected parent.2

To summarize, in those cases where the rejected parent has intentionally injured the child or the primary custodian of the child, then the rejection of the injuring parent by the child is rational and should be supported by the courts. However, in those cases where one parent is unreasonably rejected by a child and where the other parent has subtly or otherwise caused the rejection, then the court must do more to protect the relationship between the child and the wrongfully rejected parent — and to deter the alienating parent from engaging in the behavior which caused the rift between the child and the rejected parent.

Further, where the rejection has been so absolute as to destroy, perhaps for all time, the relationship between the rejected parent and the child, the court must allow the tortious recovery for the devastation caused by what is often calculated and blatant manipulation of the child’s affection.

6f21cea804e92f6a314b49dd9190d720

1*Associate Professor of Law, Lincoln Memorial University, Duncan School of Law. The author teaches Family Law and Torts, has been practicing family law for seventeen years and is Board Certified as a Family Law Specialist by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization. The author would like to thank Dr. Wayne Sneath of Davenport University for his constant encouragement, and Dean Gordon Russell and Professor Katherine Marsh for their invaluable assistance.

Richard A. Warshak, Bringing Sense to Parental Alienation: A Look at the Disputes and the Evidence, 37 Fam. L.Q. 273, 273, 280 (2003) (citing Richard A. Gardner, The Parental Alienation Syndrome (2d ed. 1998)). Warshak notes that there are:

three essential elements in this definition: (1) rejection or denigration of a parent that reaches the level of campaign (i.e., it is persistent and not merely an occasional episode); (2) the rejection is irrational (i.e., the alienation is not a reasonable response to the alienated parent’s behavior); and (3) it is a partial result of the non-alienated parent’s influence. If any element is absent, the term PAS is not applicable. Properly understood, a clinician using the term PAS does not automatically assume that the favored parent has influenced a child’s alienation from the other parent. Rather, the term PAS is used only when there is evidence for all three elements.

Id. at 280.

2 Bruce L. Beverly, A Remedy to Fit the Crime: A Call for the Unreasonable Rejection of a Parent by a Child as Tort, 15(1) J.L. & Fam. Stud. 153 (2013). 

Trends in the Efficacy of Parental Alienation Allegations

in Child Custody Cases and Their Implications for Tortious Action

Bruce L. Beverly*

JUDGE You are FIRED - 2015-16FLORIDA!

STOP VIOLATING PARENT’S RIGHTS

STOP ALIENATING PARENTS FROM THEIR CHILDREN!Nothing justifies the minimization or removal of a fit and loving parent from a child's life NOTHING 2015

 

Broward County Public School conspires with Judge Manno-Schurr to enable Parental Alienation, a severe form of child abuse.

 

Parental Alienation

Parental alienation is a growing problem faced by the courts — a problem which deserves a better remedy than currently exists. Parental alienation (PA), insofar as this paper is concerned, is defined as the unreasonable or irrational rejection of a parent by a child primarily due to the “negative influence of the other parent.”1 In a previous article, this author discussed the balancing interests of the fundamental constitutional protection of the right of a parent to raise a child as s/he sees fit, and the failure of Courts to protect the interests of an unreasonably rejected parent.2 To summarize, in those cases where the rejected parent has intentionally injured the child or the primary custodian of the child, then the rejection of the injuring parent by the child is rational and should be supported by the courts. However, in those cases where one parent is unreasonably rejected by…

View original post 383 more words