Every debate from now on should promise to ask a real question about Family Law Reform; 50/50 Parenting Plans!!!
– Justice is a concept of moral rightness based on ethics, rationality, law,natural law, religion, equity or fairness, as well as the administration of the law, taking into account the inalienable and inborn rights of all human beings and citizens…
Parental alienation is real. It’s been real for a long time. It may take time for the mental health community to go through the red tape of getting the words right so they cover their own butts and figure out how they mutually agree on treatment so they will be paid for it, but it’s there nonetheless. Parental Alienation like many other things in this world is caught up in the red tape of humanity while good parents and children suffer and families are destroyed.
“It’s Constitutional! Discussing Constitution and Family Law Reform.” — See~~>http://sco.lt/6t4kJF
If you’re concerned about Crime and Delinquency then you should be concerned with the Reform of the Family Courts in America. Here’s why ~ According to the Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, “The most reliable indicator of violent crime in a community is the proportion of fatherless families. Fatherless families, in turn, are caused in part by family courts that exclude fathers from post-divorce parenting. By instituting shared parenting after divorce or separation, fathers would be allowed to continue to show their sons the right way to grow into manhood.” ~AND~ In the release, Dr. Ned Holstein, founder and board chair of National Parents Organization said: “Unfortunately, however, our nation’s family courts prevent millions of divorced and separated fathers from having meaningful relationships with their children, which only leave their children more vulnerable to this unfortunate behavior.”
That’s why EVERY Presidential Debate MUST discuss the Family Courts in America and how to fix it.
Jose is gathering 875 signatures to Stop Court’s Denial Of Reasonable Parent/Child Contact
Dear Honorable Jack Reed- Family-Friends, Family Court Reform: It matters to me because lawless america is all about exposing the fact that we now live in Lawless America. We no longer have laws that are enforced because judges do whatever they want to do. America has also become lawless because government officials are dishonest and/or corrupt. Millions of victims never realized what happen to them In court. I began to research and the more I began to look at the statutes in what was going on in our judicial branch, I began to see that there were some real problems that we have in our branch of government and the judiciary.Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness were promised to each of us by our founding fathers. And the resulting legal system was intended to protect us and sustain us with reason, fairness and order. But the present state of family law makes this harder and harder to achieve – particularly in regards to fathers rights and visitation rights,Arbitrary laws and a confrontational legal system have created a litigious nightmare for many of us. I m motivated to joining the cause defending our fatherhood In a broken Family Law System. American fathers are led down a primes path everyday In our family courts, often with disastrous legal results. Fathers wind up In the land of Gender Bias, where we are systematically stripped of our rights, often without the slightest Idea of why It Is happening to us. Courts are supposed to approach cases of child custody , support payments, visitation rights In what we call a gender-neutral posture. It sounds fair, and It Is fair. Judges are not enforcing these gender laws fairly, and few seem to care. We have and will continue more of these problems until proud fathers like me organize and speak up to demand fair treatment . We have a legitimate legal Issue and we need to make It public our concerns a public Issue. We need the courts to hear us.
Cherish is gathering 500 signatures to Stop Court’s Denial Of Reasonable Parent/Child Contact
I have 3 boys one being a single father who is 19. I didn’t know how horrible the “system” is against fathers. My son signed the voluntary paternity acknowledgement as soon as the “courts” allowed him to do so. He has been involved in EVERY aspect of his child life from the moment he found out he was going to be a father at the age of 15. He finished High School and graduated at age 16, started college at age 17. For the first 3 months of his child’s life HE was the one who woke up with him in the night for the feedings, diaper changes and all the other reasons a baby wakes up in the middle of the night. He did this for HIS SON, because he loves him and because he wanted what was best for his son’s mother who was still in high school. He wanted to make sure she got the sleep she needed so she could do well in school and graduate. He did this not necessarily for her or to make her life easier but, he did this for his SON, so his son who was a child of teenagers could have both of his parents with at least a high school diploma. When he and his sons mother broke up, they agreed on a 50/50 custody and placement. For the last 18 months this is what he and the mother did. One week with one parent the next week with the other parent. CPS got involved because his son kept getting critically hurt in her care. They found enough evidence to charge her with 3 counts of neglect, and more than probable cause to charge her father (who is a 2nd degree sex offender) with sexual assault of my sons 2 1/2 year old. When my son disagreed with the “informal disposition agreement” and the “safety plan” and the “obligations” of this agreement, which it clearly states “the child and parents, guardian and legal custodian are notified of their right to object at any time to the facts or terms of this agreement. If there are objections, the intake worker may alter the terms of the agreement or recommend that a petition be filed…..” My son did disagree with the terms or “obligations” and rather than his concerns being addressed, the caseworker signed the back where he was supposed to sign “Father refuses to sign” The mother of his child has been and is working with a “parent aide” and she gave her the name of an attorney to talk to about her rights to the child. In Wisconsin and in almost EVERY state in the USA a father has NO rights when a child is born out of wed lock. The only rights he has is to sign the paternity acknowledgment and then hire an attorney and spend thousands of dollars to open a custody case so he can have LEGAL shared custody and placement. Until there is such an order an unwed mother can refuse at any point to allow her child’s father the right to see his own child or children. There are laws in place stating that it against the law to discriminate people based on race, sex, sexual orientation, so on and so forth, HOWEVER, this same law does not hold true to family law. Yes the FATHER has the right to file a petition for custody/placement, BUT the MOTHER does NOT have to do this to have custody/placement of the SAME child. This law needs to change, it needs to be equal, I believe there are MANY fathers labeled “deadbeat dads” because they end up not being able to keep affording to go to court and hire attorneys and fight for their children. We the people need to plead with our legislature’s to change this sexist and biased law. Please sign this petition for this state and every state, to make changes that are more fair not for the mothers or the fathers BUT for the innocent CHILDREN that deserve to have equal time and love from BOTH parents!!!
Rolando is gathering 10 signatures to Stop Court’s Denial Of Reasonable Parent/Child Contact
I’m a victim of the 9th judicial circuit for in Osceola County, FL whom put me in a highly child support calculated with a job application job that I never get so I never couldn’t pay the $866.13 and the child support enforcement unit suspended my driver license. (License that I depend) because I’m a truck driver and one of this suspension lasted almost 3 months and I lost my job and so on.
Judicial ethics and discipline
A lack of impartiality is evident when a judge takes a party’s appeal personally or over-reacts to a motion to disqualify. For example, the Nebraska Supreme Court sanctioned behavior that disclosed a judge’s “unhealthy and wholly improper concern with the protection of her own rulings from appellate reversal.”
When a judge becomes embroiled in a controversy, the line between the judge and the controversy before the court becomes blurred, and the judge’s impartiality or appearance of impartiality may become compromised. . . . The responsibility of a judge is to decide matters that have been submitted to the court by the parties. The judge may not, having decided a case, advocate for or . . . materially assist one party at the expense of the other. Such advocacy creates the appearance, and perhaps the reality, of partiality on the part of the judge. This, in turn, erodes public confidence in…
View original post 976 more words
3 thoughts on “Stop Family Court Kidnapping”
LikeLiked by 2 people
LikeLiked by 3 people
LikeLiked by 2 people