Dear Mom and Dad, Please remember my life has been turned upside down and I never had a vote.

Divorce Visitation Requests from Your Child (by: Dr. Anne Brown, PhD, RN) – DivorceForce

Dear Mom and Dad,

Please remember my life has been turned upside down and I never had a vote. I don’t have a rulebook to negotiate waters totally unfamiliar to me. It is really hard for me to understand that my family has broken up. I feel scared that I will loose one or both of you. I don’t know what to do with all the bad feelings I have. It would really mean a lot to me if you could do a few things to help me with the land mines I seem to be stepping on. Thanks for taking the time to listen.

1. Remember Your “ex” is my Family!
I now have the best and worst of both of you. I don’t get to divorce anyone. Whatever you didn’t like about your spouse, I now have to deal with all by myself. I don’t know how, so I am going to have to figure that out without a rule- book. Your “ex” is my Dad or Mom so if you can’t help me have a good relationship, please don’t make things more difficult.

Facebook.com/StandupforZoraya

2. Don’t Use Me!

I am not your messenger. Do not interrogate me. I don’t know what will upset you. I am going to have to figure the “what information goes where” thing and that in itself is pretty crazy for my age. Do not “dump” your anger at your “ex” on me please. When I start to look, sound, and have mannerisms, like my parent your “ex” don’t be surprised and don’t blame me. You at one time wanted me to be a combination of both of you, remember!

When you interrogate me to get information about what is going on in “the other house” and you use that information for your “ex” issues, I will probably get in trouble. Make it safe for me to come to you to be able to talk about and get tools to handle things I don’t know how to handle in “the other house”.

“Changing a child last name (away from the father’s) is an act of venom”

http://www.causes.com/causes/409526-children-s-rights-and-family-law-reform

“The only normal people are the ones you don’t know very well.”

http://www.causes.com/causes/409526-children-s-rights-and-family-law-reform

http://www.causes.com/causes/409526-children-s-rights-and-family-law-reform

Children’s Rights:
Reform is needed! Our children’s well-being is at stake!!

Kids Need Both, Inc  

A Mother’s Day message from Dr. Mark Roseman of The Toby Center.

For an increasing number of moms, Mother’s Day without their children are expected, and characteristic. It’s characteristic of mothers who are court ordered to have visitation that they not see their children on this day.

For dads, too, there are many whose children cannot spend time with their them.

Why? Court orders.

I am NOT silent the U.S. LEGAL SYSTEM ABUSE – RISE AND OVERCOME

Working on the Logistics of Fundamental U.S. Legal System Reform on a Grassroots Basis.

Attorney Zena Crenshaw-Logal*, Executive Director of NFOJA’s corporate sponsor and a NFOJA Co-Administrator, addressed what was described as the “Myth of America’s Unaccountable Judiciary” during the first half of Progress In The World, an internet radio broadcast hosted by Walter Davis of Marketing Strategies of California.  To listen and join the related NFOJA discussion~~~>

CLICK HERE

Gone viral is the video of a Family Court judge in Florida, tongue- lashing a woman described as a domestic violence victim.

NFOJA (National Forum On Judicial Accountability) reached out for a comment on the clip by Dr. Jill Jones-Soderman who recently joined the board of directors for NFOJA’s nonprofit corporate sponsor known as THE LAW PROJECT @www.njcdlp.org

As Founder and Executive Director of Foundation for the Child Victims of the Family Courts, Dr. Jones-Soderman is no stranger to family courts across America. Here is her comment:

Judicial Engineering is a phrase that should become as familiar to Americans as judicial activism, judicial independence, judicial misconduct, and judicial accountability. Learn More at https://jedi1.wikispaces.com/INTRODUCTION

“Judge Gerri Collins has reached a new nadir, if that is possible, in a division of the court system widely known for depraved indifference to human life, in the course of their daily practice. The level of pompous grandiosity assumed by family court judges when associating with a perceived slight to their authority reaches a level of diagnosable clinical delusion disorder.”

Jill Jones-Soderman
PhD, MSW, MSHS
Executive Director – FCVFC 

View the video

National Forum On Judicial Accountability

JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY ADVOCATES: Meetings are proceeding well between constituents and U.S. Representatives as part of the Opt IN USA campaign. Participants are reporting that congressional staffers seem quite interested in their concerns.

We are making clear that the problem of unchecked judicial misconduct in America has become a constitutional and international human rights crisis.

We need as many people as possible to deliver the Opt IN USA Congressional Information Package to the closest district office of their U.S. Representatives we have yet to reach.

As to the members of Congress who have received our material, we need fellow constituents to join their Opt IN USA ambassador in:

1. a follow-up letter requesting an update from the member of Congress who was visited;

2. at least two (2) online meetings to compile known evidence of judicial misconduct in their state;

3. an investigation request to the judiciary committee of their state legislature and the U.S. Attorney for their district in anticipation of being part of a national investigation request to the U.S. House Judiciary Committee; and

4. an Opt IN USA support request to your U.S. Senator(s).

**To learn more and arrange to be part of our district office meetings, please visit Opt IN USA @www.thethirddegree.net

**To be part of follow-up for these states and districts, please Contact Us via www.thethirddegree.net

> Alabama (5th Dist. – Rep. Mo Brooks);
> Indiana (1st Dist. – Rep. Pete Visclosky);
> New Mexico (2nd Dist. – Rep. Steve Pearce);
> New York –
(14th Dist. – Rep. Joseph Crowsley)
(17th Dist. – Rep. Nita Lowey)
(18th Dist. – Rep. Sean Maloney)
> Ohio (6th Dist. – Rep. Bill Johnson)
> Pennsylvania (13th Dist. – Rep. Brendan Boyle);
> Tennessee (1st Dist. – Rep. Phil Roe);
> Texas (24th Dist. – Rep. Kenny Marchant)
> Virginia (7th Dist. – Rep. Dave Brat)

Thank you!

Opt IN USA Campaign Coordinators

‪#‎RESISTtheCatch22‬ Learn more and become part of Opt IN USA by visiting www.thethirddegree.net Contact Us Today!

 

JUNK SCIENCE AND THE REAL PARENTAL ALIENATION IN FAMILY COURT THAT NOBODY TALKS ABOUT

Help David Inguanzo find a Qualified Monitor (LMFT, LCSW, or Dr. of Psych, etc.) to facilitate “Supervised Visitation” with his daughter Zoraya. WE WILL PAY FOR THE SERVICES~~> If you can help please call Stuart Abramson at (305) 270-7796 – Reference Case No. 2008-029595 – FC 17~~>

Yes, the time has come to discuss one of the most lucrative aspects of the divorce industry: Parental alienation, also known PAS or the dreaded ‘parentectomy.’

‘Parentectomy?’ What the?

Yes, you heard right – there is a actual diagnosis used in family courts throughout the land known as the ‘parentectomy.’ Never heard of it? Go ahead and google and then google some more.  It’s an actual thing, and despite the fact that most researchers have called it junk science, a disturbing number of judges actually believes in it.

Judges merely redirect the dysfunction of one parent as a means to achieve an equitable settlement without regard for children. Prospective lawyers to become judges practice under a code of ethics where they are only allowed to have regard their clients and not the children. A prospect practices under these rules of engagement for 20-30m years before a simple letter of appointment to the bench. They can in no way be expected to have regard for children after this indoctrination. The code of ethics for those lawyers practicing family law needs to change before anything gets better for children. Just know the enemy of your children are the lawyers and judges themselves. https://youtu.be/gYwrJHxfWgQ?list=PLED6CE6FEA630E99E

Judges merely redirect the dysfunction of one parent as a means to achieve an equitable settlement without regard for children. Prospective lawyers to become judges practice under a code of ethics where they are only allowed to have regard their clients and not the children. A prospect practices under these rules of engagement for 20-30m years before a simple letter of appointment to the bench. They can in no way be expected to have regard for children after this indoctrination. The code of ethics for those lawyers practicing family law needs to change before anything gets better for children. Just know the enemy of your children are the lawyers and judges themselves. https://youtu.be/gYwrJHxfWgQ?list=PLED6CE6FEA630E99E

In fact, when I discussed the Detroit ‘throw the kids in juvy’ case recently, I was surprised to read the judge’s comments alleging parental alienation. In retrospect I probably shouldn’t have been surprised that a seasoned professional would believe in junk science – upon further investigation I learned that the parentectomy diagnosis is alive and well in family courts throughout the land.

A typical family court parentectomy diagnosis goes like this: One parent, typically the non-custodial child-support paying one, claims that the other parent, typically the custodial child-support receiving one, has alienated the children against him or her. An official diagnosis usually involves a divorce lawyer and a so-called “mental health professional” or two working for the aggrieved and allegedly alienated parent.

http://www.causes.com/causes/409526-children-s-rights-and-family-law-reform

Of course in reality this is a misdiagnosis and the parent claiming to be the victim of a parentectomy is almost always suffering from an entirely different malady – let’s call it the ‘walletectomy’.  This syndrome occurs when a litigant becomes estranged and alienated from his wallet due to child support payments. Is this all-too- common misdiagnosis a mistake?  Do the lawyers and judges involved really believe the parent is suffering from a parentectomy and not the much more obvious and far less serious walletectomy?

Is family court a corrupt money-driven system?

http://www.causes.com/causes/409526-children-s-rights-and-family-law-reform

You be the judge.

Just Cause For An Emergency Custody Hearing?

Judges merely redirect the dysfunction of one parent as a means to achieve an equitable settlement without regard for children. Prospective lawyers to become judges practice under a code of ethics where they are only allowed to have regard their clients and not the children. A prospect practices under these rules of engagement for 20-30m years before a simple letter of appointment to the bench. They can in no way be expected to have regard for children after this indoctrination. The code of ethics for those lawyers practicing family law needs to change before anything gets better for children. Just know the enemy of your children are the lawyers and judges themselves. https://youtu.be/gYwrJHxfWgQ?list=PLED6CE6FEA630E99E

Judges merely redirect the dysfunction of one parent as a means to achieve an equitable settlement without regard for children. Prospective lawyers to become judges practice under a code of ethics where they are only allowed to have regard their clients and not the children. A prospect practices under these rules of engagement for 20-30m years before a simple letter of appointment to the bench. They can in no way be expected to have regard for children after this indoctrination. The code of ethics for those lawyers practicing family law needs to change before anything gets better for children. Just know the enemy of your children are the lawyers and judges themselves. https://youtu.be/gYwrJHxfWgQ?list=PLED6CE6FEA630E99E

Judges merely redirect the dysfunction of one parent as a means to achieve an equitable settlement without regard for children. Prospective lawyers to become judges practice under a code of ethics where they are only allowed to have regard their clients and not the children. A prospect practices under these rules of engagement for 20-30m years before a simple letter of appointment to the bench. They can in no way be expected to have regard for children after this indoctrination. The code of ethics for those lawyers practicing family law needs to change before anything gets better for children. Just know the enemy of your children are the lawyers and judges themselves. https://youtu.be/gYwrJHxfWgQ?list=PLED6CE6FEA630E99E

Judges merely redirect the dysfunction of one parent as a means to achieve an equitable settlement without regard for children. Prospective lawyers to become judges practice under a code of ethics where they are only allowed to have regard their clients and not the children. A prospect practices under these rules of engagement for 20-30m years before a simple letter of appointment to the bench. They can in no way be expected to have regard for children after this indoctrination. The code of ethics for those lawyers practicing family law needs to change before anything gets better for children. Just know the enemy of your children are the lawyers and judges themselves. https://youtu.be/gYwrJHxfWgQ?list=PLED6CE6FEA630E99E

Judges merely redirect the dysfunction of one parent as a means to achieve an equitable settlement without regard for children. Prospective lawyers to become judges practice under a code of ethics where they are only allowed to have regard their clients and not the children. A prospect practices under these rules of engagement for 20-30m years before a simple letter of appointment to the bench. They can in no way be expected to have regard for children after this indoctrination. The code of ethics for those lawyers practicing family law needs to change before anything gets better for children. Just know the enemy of your children are the lawyers and judges themselves. https://youtu.be/gYwrJHxfWgQ?list=PLED6CE6FEA630E99E

Judges merely redirect the dysfunction of one parent as a means to achieve an equitable settlement without regard for children. Prospective lawyers to become judges practice under a code of ethics where they are only allowed to have regard their clients and not the children. A prospect practices under these rules of engagement for 20-30m years before a simple letter of appointment to the bench. They can in no way be expected to have regard for children after this indoctrination. The code of ethics for those lawyers practicing family law needs to change before anything gets better for children. Just know the enemy of your children are the lawyers and judges themselves. https://youtu.be/gYwrJHxfWgQ?list=PLED6CE6FEA630E99E

Judges merely redirect the dysfunction of one parent as a means to achieve an equitable settlement without regard for children. Prospective lawyers to become judges practice under a code of ethics where they are only allowed to have regard their clients and not the children. A prospect practices under these rules of engagement for 20-30m years before a simple letter of appointment to the bench. They can in no way be expected to have regard for children after this indoctrination. The code of ethics for those lawyers practicing family law needs to change before anything gets better for children. Just know the enemy of your children are the lawyers and judges themselves. https://youtu.be/gYwrJHxfWgQ?list=PLED6CE6FEA630E99E

What is an emergency custody order?

If your child is in danger from her other parent, you can go to your county courthouse and request emergency temporary custody. Depending on the laws in your county, you may or may not have to appear before a judge. The court may place your child with you on a short-term basis.

Is There Just Cause For An Emergency Custody Hearing?

I’m worried that my children’s mother is abusing them. How do I know if there is just cause to ask for an emergency custody hearing?

Answer:

While I am not licensed to practice law in your state and cannot give you legal advice, I can give some general observations on this issue based on the jurisdiction where I practice.

The Alienating Parents’ Tool Of Choice

Persuasive Rhetoric
The Tool of Choice for the Alienating Parent

Persuasive Rhetoric refers to using language in an emotionally laden manner with the purpose of convincing the audience of some particular perspective.

Persuasive Rhetoric is a tool for selling ideas, beliefs and positions on a given topic or subject. It is unrelated to truth. It only refers to the spin, the story and the goal of winning over the audience. Nothing in the message requires truth.

In the case of Parental Alienation, this concept is useful in that it describes a favorite modus operandi that the alienating parent uses to vilify the targeted parent.

In this context, the alienating parent will allege something either entirely untrue or grossly distorted regarding the targeted parent. It is done with such emotion and tenacity, that the audience is typically drawn into its message. Then the alienating parent does the same thing with another listener. Now there is a group of three who all believe the same either untrue or grossly distorted thing.

There are now three voices in this chorus, and the intensity level tends to increase with the volume and the numbers of those involved. Then someone in this group of three relates this to another person, who questions it but is told that several other people told them the same thing, so it must be true. This new “convert” to the distortion then unwittingly spreads the distortion to someone else, and to someone else, and to someone else.

Socrates, the story goes, is approached by a man who wants to tell him some urgent news. Before he does this, Socrates stops him and says he would first like to ask him three questions before he tells his story. The man agrees.

The first question is, “do you know the person to whom this news occurred?”

Answer: “No, but I know someone who does know them. “

Question two: “did you witness the event yourself?”

Answer: “No, but I spoke to someone who was there.”

Question Three: ” Is the news good or bad?”

Answer: “It would be considered bad news.”

Socrates reviews accordingly, “You do not know the person to whom this happened, you only heard about it from someone who says they were there, and it is bad news. Thank you, but I think I would rather not listen to this news.”

Rightly or wrongly, we humans do tend to be herd animals. Due to our wiring and our evolution, when the herd is exposed to some message that is potentially dangerous or at least negative, we do tend to give it extra weight, and then pass it on.

This is a self-protective reflex that is easily exploited by the alienating parent in their mission to obliterate the targeted parent in Parental Alienation cases.

“There are some who say Parental Alienation is a new concept and should be replaced with other verbiage more grounded in established psychological research. I’m not too sure where this comment is coming from but to help clarify the situation, there are 94 pages of references, peer review articles, books, journal articles and other works that make reference to Parental Alienation and Parental Alienation Syndrome and the phenomenon of alienation some go back to the 1940’s. So it is hardly the case that Parental Alienation is a new concept; clearly it’s not.” ~ www.drbobevans.com

Since the words “Parental Alienation” were first uttered within a family court room, it comes as no surprise that the echoes emanating from adversaries within both the mental health and legal environments have blurred and tarnished the very concept and, at times, left it unrecognizable. The side opposing an assertion of Parental Alienation is tasked with discrediting, disputing and demeaning it, hoping to convince the court to ultimately reject it. The adversarial process within the family court will predictably batter the concept about a good deal. Consequently, much misinformation, partial information and outright untruths and fabrications emerge and begin to fester.

When one considers that arguing attorneys and family law judges typically learn about Parental Alienation via arguments, examinations and cross examinations in court, it should not be surprising that such understandings are usually limited to the facts of a particular case, and are not necessarily characteristic of specific knowledge acquisition. In other words, the understandings about Parental Alienation as born through litigation are anecdotal and unique, far from a balanced and complete instruction. Judges and attorneys may hear about Parental Alienation from expert witnesses who have essentially been hired to discredit it or to assert it, and their information may be distorted or contaminated by the need to persuade (i.e., biased). In other words, the adversarial environment where it is argued is ripe for distortions and partial truths. What is important to know is that there have been specific arguments created to discredit it that can be shown to be absolutely false. For example, the argument that it is not accepted by the professional community can be shown to be absolutely false. The argument about its presence or absence in the DSM-5 can be answered completely and affirmatively. The argument that it is “junk science” can be shown to be completely unsupported by the scientific literature.

The two day course offered by NAPAS is designed not only to provide a full and complete picture of parental alienation but to impart practical strategies to attorneys representing either a rejected parent or an alienating parent and the course material is supported by the scientific literature and professional consensus.

Recent Updates

•  National Association of Parental Alienation Specialists
  

  It is important to prepare your clients for Parenting Plan and Timesharing Evaluation, especially if there is either known or suspected Parental Alienation going-on in the case. #parentalalienation

  Preparing Your Clients for Parenting Plan and Timesharing Evaluations

  It is important to prepare your clients for PPTEs, especially if there is either known or suspected Parental Alienation going-on in the case. These evaluations are complex and can be stressful for your clients. 

  Here are 5 Common Behaviors of Alienating Parents. The literature provides many more behaviors of Alienating Parents, learn to recognize them by joining us on April 1, 2016 for a 2-day symposium “Effective Litigation of Parental Alienation” more info…more

  5 Behaviors of Alienating Parents in Child Custody Cases — Here is a list of 5 of the most common behaviors of alienating parents in cases of child custody where parental alienation is suspected, and child symptoms. 

  Today we are pleased to announce the launch of the National Association of Parental Alienation Specialists. Frequently we are asked by parents, “Do you know any attorneys who are knowledgeable about parental alienation in our area?” Unfortunately,…more

  In today’s information-saturated, internet-driven world, parents going through divorce have the ability to be more informed than ever before. 

   

  The Science of Misperception and Parental Alienation: is Parental Alienation a Syndrome?

  The Science of Misperception and Parental Alienation

  Applying the science of misperception and how to use the available research in preparation for defending a parental alienation case in court.

• Parental Alienation vs Parental Alienation Syndrome… 

• Announcing the National Association of Parental.Alienation..

• The Impact of Parental Alienation on Children

• Top 5 Issues to Consider When Hiring an Expert…

• Transition Difficulties & Alienation with…

• Transition Difficulties vs Alienation with…

• Educating the Court on Parental Alienation
• Is Hiring an Expert Worth it in Family Law Cases…
• Educating the Court on Parental Alienation 
• Is Hiring an Expert Worth it in Family Law Cases. 
• Hiring an Expert in Family Law Cases involving…
• Parenting, Attachment and Parental Alienation 
• Child Custody: Rehabilitating Your Case
• The Benefits of Expert Role Distinction in PA…
• Expert Roles in Parent Alienation Court Cases
• Pursuing and Defending Parent Alienation in Court
• Moderate levels of Parental Alienation: Part Two
• Symptoms for Moderate Cases of Parental…
• Mild Cases of Parental Alienation
• Levels of Severity of Parental Alienation
• How to Prepare for and Present Issues of Parental…
• The Symptoms of Parental Alienation
• Forced Visitation and Access between a Child &…
• Parental Alienation and Child Abuse
• Is Parental Alienation Anti-Feminist or unfairly…
• Parental Alienation as a Diagnosis in Court Cases
• Should Parental Alienation be Considered a…
• Parental Alienation and Confusion in Clinical…
• Child Alienation from One Parent
• Does Parental Alienation Oversimplify the…

• Parent Alienation: Current Controversies

  Visit our PA Resources page for more about Parental Alienation.

  Source: The Tool Of Choice For The Alienating Parent | National Association Of Parental Alienation Specialists

  Categories: Child Custody Parent Alienation, Parental Alienation, Parental Alienation in Court  child custody parental alienation, parental alienation case, Persuasive Rhetoric, signs of alienating parents, symptoms of parental alienation

   
  

  This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Related articles

• The starting place of Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) is with the Child’s Puppet Master
• The Role of Domestic Violence in Parental Alienation
• Truth is in a man’s actions, not in someone else’s blind accusations
• Narcissism and Parental Alienation Syndrome | The Recovery Expert
• Why do PAS parents act like they do?
• What Is Parental Alienation and How Can It Affect Custody?
• Hold Family Courts Accountable
• Judicial Accountability for Court Ordered Parental Alienation
• Family Court Stress Disorder (PTSD)…
• Would you support social security title IV D and family law reform? Asks ChangePolitics

Get Up Stand Up | Parents Rights Blog

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Human rights are commonly understood as,

“inalienable fundamental rights to which a person is inherently entitled simply because she or he is a human being.”

[1] Human rights are thus conceived as universal (applicable everywhere) and egalitarian (the same for everyone). These rights may exist as natural rights or as legal rights, in both national and international law.

Source: Bob Marley – Get Up Stand Up | Parents Rights Blog

Alienated from your child.

You really said it! I felt your pain and your frustration. I thought you said it perfectly and explained it clearly. I’ve heard those comments too many times and they were said by people who seem to care about us and were concerned about my situation. It just showed me that people have no clue when it comes to PA or PAS.

I’ve been fighting now for over 10 years. My oldest is now 21 and wants nothing to do with me. She hates me. My worst nightmare has come true. I have spent every dime, every ounce of energy, and every minute fighting for my 2 children who I love with all my heart and soul. My ex has put my kids through every alienation tactic there is. My kids had no chance of coming through this with anything but hatred for me. I will never give up on them.

http://www.causes.com/causes/409526-children-s-rights-and-family-law-reform

http://www.causes.com/causes/409526-children-s-rights-and-family-law-reform

After 10 years of fighting and to get to this point, most people don’t understand why I won’t stop, especially since my oldest rejects me. They no longer give me comments of hope and seem to think I have issues. They know nothing about PA or PAS. I wish more people would get to know about it, without having to go through it, but I guess that’s the only way people learn about it is when they are going through it. 10 years ago, there wasn’t a name for it and people really looked at me as a bad person to loose my children. I am not a bad parent, I am a fabulous Mom. My children were happy and healthy and a little bit spoiled. My ex had me arrested for something I didn’t do and used that case against me in our custody case. Once he got full custody that criminal case against me was dropped. His lawyer knew exactly what to do to get him full custody. He used that false allegation against me the whole way. 3 months after moving in with their Father, his girlfriend became my 7 and 11 yr old kid’s mom and I became Angie.

I only want you to know that it doesn’t matter what sex the alienating parent is. There are just as evil Fathers out there alienating Mothers too. I have been screwed by the court system. My lawyers have told me, “the Judge HATES you!” This explains why he got away with never doing what he was ordered to do and won every time we went to court and something was taken from me every time, until I had no rights as a parent and no money. I had the Judge say twice that she didn’t care if it was fair.

If the Judge wasn’t bias, I would have gotten to see my kids, but she made it impossible for me to see them and she enjoyed being so powerful. First she let him move out of state with our kids, then she added extraordinary expenses to what my child support should be. The extra expense was for daycare that my children never went to and for braces that never ended. I am still paying for both. If child support would have been based on my income, I may have been able to afford travelling to see my kids, but I had to pay 70% of my income and the Judge didn’t care.

I am not behind on my child support. even though I’ve had to pay more of my income than is legally acceptable. My oldest moved out of her Father’s house, and got married before she turned 19. I wasn’t told she got married but I quit paying child support for her when she turned 19.

Then I put a motion in to Modify my Child Support. My ex delayed the hearing for over a year. In court the Judge asked me who told me I could quit paying child support for my 20 year old at the time. Needless to say, I had to back pay from when my daughter turn 19 until that day when she said I could quit paying. I became in arrears, just like that. I just finished last month paying child support plus the extraordinary expenses for my 21 year old married daughter who hasn’t lived with her Father in over 2 years. So as you can see things weren’t fair for me either.

Find Cause Bigger Than Self

Children’s Rights and Family Law Reform

• ← Back to the cause
  

  

About

Fighting to preserve Parent–Child relationships to improve the lives of children and strengthen society by protecting the child’s right to the love and care of both parents after separation/divorce.

http://www.causes.com/causes/409526-children-s-rights-and-family-law-reform

“Children’s Rights” is not just about Fathers, it’s also about Children, Mothers, Families, Public Advocacy, Civil Rights and Liberties. This Children’s Rights Facebook Group, Page and Cause have been created for positive outreach, networking, distribution and discussion of information related to our cause.

CHILDREN’S RIGHTS
• A continuing relationship with both parents.

• Be treated not as a piece of property, but as a human being recognized to have unique feelings, ideas, and desires consistent with that of an individual.

• Continuing care and proper guidance from each parent.

• Not to be unduly influenced by either parent to view the other parent differently.

• Express love, friendship, and respect for both parents: freedom from having to hide those stated emotions or made to be ashamed of such.

• An explanation that the impending action of divorce was in no way caused by the child’s actions.

• Not to be the subject and/or source of any and all arguments.

• Continuing, honest feedback with respect to the divorce process and its impact on the changing relationships of the family.

• Maintain regular contact with both parents and a clear explanation for any change in plans and/or cancellations.

• Enjoy a pleasurable relationship with both parents, never to be employed as a manipulative bargaining tool.

• The obligation of being a parent does not end after a divorce.

It is extremely important to understand that the bond of marriage is completely different from that of parents. This is the most common downfall in today’s society, as a dissolution of marriage takes place so does that of parenting.

 

A WORD ABOUT SELF REPRESENTATION ~ The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution has been interpreted to provide EVERY AMERICAN with the CONSTITUTIONAL right to self-representation, if they so choose. That privilege, like all other constitutional rights, should be enjoyed without fear of harassment, prejudice, or abuse.

Furthermore, no law, regulation, or policy should exist to abridge or surreptitiously extinguish that right. Self-Represented Litigants have no less of a right to FAIR and MEANINGFUL due process under the federal and state constitutions as those individuals who choose to utilize an attorney for their legal affairs and issues. In fact, NOWHERE in any state or federal constitution does it specify that the hiring of a lawyer is a prerequisite to exercising one’s due process rights.

Democratic principles dictate that we have the right to freely choose between self-representation and hiring a lawyer to handle our legal matters without suffering humiliation, prejudice, or penalization. After all, it is the parties to the litigation that ultimately have to deal with the consequences of the case’s outcome, and not the judge or the lawyers involved in the matter.

Contrary to the view of certain judges and lawyers, those who opt to litigate their own legal matters without an attorney are NOT second-class citizens deserving of contempt and injustice. Instead, they are BRAVE CITIZENS with an inalienable right to have their legal causes adjudicated objectively and justly — with or without a lawyer.

Self-representation can be a difficult, time-consuming, and often frightening experience, especially for those burdened by demanding work schedules, family responsibilities, and other obligations of day-to-day living.

Accordingly, those who engage in the difficult task of self-litigation should be REVERED for their COURAGE and DEDICATION, not scorned or abused.

We also need to amass momentous opposition against those persons, agencies, and institutions who, in the interest of protecting huge profits, careers, and prestige, subject self-litigants to a hostile and often abusive litigation atmosphere calculated to suppress self-representation and force people to become completely and financially dependent on lawyers to gain “paid” access to a taxpayer-funded legal system.

http://www.iloveandneedmydaughter.blogspot.com

 

Conference · Hosted by Fathers & Families Coalition of America 

http://www.causes.com/causes/409526-children-s-rights-and-family-law-reform

http://www.causes.com/causes/409526-children-s-rights-and-family-law-reform

FFCA Live updates

Be the first to know when FFCA Live opens for our National Families and Fathers 17th Annual Conference, and stay up-to-date on on other news and promotions.

This week, we will announce our full online conference schedule… Over the past several years, we hosted virtual attendees from Japan to Ireland, Pakistan to Colombia, Russia to Africa, Hawaii to Brazil, Australia to America and of over 90 nations!

2016, Can’t make it to the conference this year? No problem! You can watch every session — including Q&A’s, plenary sessions, workshops and other exclusive content — on-demand from the comfort of your office or living room…

Sign up for FFCA Live email updates and RegisterFeatures

• High-definition live stream with pause / rewind capability
• An archive of all your conference passes for future on-demand viewing of all sessions
• A PDF of the official conference program guide.
• PowerPoints from all sessions
• Q&A for all workshops and through our eVerfication
• Attendance Certificate

Dr. Jennifer Kane, sociologist at the University of North Carolina, discusses her recent study regarding the non-monetary support provided by low-income non-custodial fathers and how the research further debunks the deadbeat dad myth.

Title IVe Fraud Investigation Demand Letter Delivery to COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM.

Related articles

• Fatherlessness is the root cause of at least 20 other social problems.
• Children Need Both Parents
• Family Court Stress Disorder (PTSD)…
• A Year Without My Daughter Zoraya. Here’s to you Judge Valerie Manno-Schurr.
• Would you support social security title IV D and family law reform? Asks ChangePolitics
• Child support needs to catch up to reflect new roles for fathers, say experts
• Why should a custodial parent be allowed to deny access to the other parent?
• Malachi’s Law ” We The Families
• Stop Child Abuse for Profit Cause
• Child Visitation Hits the Internet

Child support needs to catch up to reflect new roles for fathers, say experts

Why should a custodial parent be allowed to deny access to the other parent?

Child Visitation Hits the Internet

Fatherlessness is the root cause of at least 20 other social problems.

Children Need Both Parents

Family Court Stress Disorder (PTSD)…

Malachi’s Law ” We The Families

Stop Child Abuse for Profit Cause

A Year Without My Daughter Zoraya. Here’s to you Judge Valerie Manno-Schurr.

Would you support social security title IV D and family law reform? Asks ChangePolitics

Judge Manno-Schurr deprives parent of equal parental rights and time with child.

Courts empower alienation in divorce child custody battles when they deprive a parent of the ability to exercise their equal parental rights and time with their child. This leads to parental alienation syndrome.

Stand up for Zoraya

Separating and divorcing parents suffer injuries of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in Family Courts.

When Family Court’s Judges enable a party (Parent) to interfere with parental contact without any clear and convincing evidence that the other party (Parent) is harmful or dangerous it is Parental Alienation Child abuse.

Parental Alienation

Parental alienation occurs when a parent intentionally does not honor the other parent’s visitation rights. Oftentimes the child(ren) are taught to become unjustly obsessed with negative qualities of the other parent. Both the parent and the child share antagonistic views of the other parent. The child sometimes will tell the parent that he/she does not want to visit with the parent. This is usually done by the child at the insistence of the other parent.

Oftentimes visitation (time sharing) becomes chronically interfered with. The one sabotages the relationship between the other parent and the child. The parent must take action through the court. Contacting a family law attorney as soon as possible to discuss the problems is imperative. The parent should keep a diary of all the denied visitations (time sharing) as well as the denied telephone calls, holiday visits that were denied, denial of the parents ability to partake in the medical, educational and welfare of the child(ren).

PARENTAL ALIENATION SYNDROME (PAS) CASE LAW

Our Family Law System preys on the Parent-Child relationship to increase the business of the courts. We want to educate our legislators to correct this wrong.

Good, …””FIT”…, caring, and loving parents who are cut off from their kids are unable, and most times, do not want to communicate with the “child-contact interfering (alienating) parent” because anything they say will only be twisted and lied about.