Still the most insidious and evil thing to do to children

logo2b2-2b2016Parental Alienation Syndrome Isn’t in the DSM…YET, but It’s in Plenty of Arguments

Following the 2009 in vitro-assisted birth of Gus, a very public legal argument broke out between mother Danielle Schreiber and her former boyfriend and the child’s sperm donor, Jason Patric. Patric, a well-known actor who starred in films such as The Lost Boys and Speed 2: Cruise Control, petitioned for parental rights, arguing that he and Schreiber had been partners for years, and that he had every intention of fathering the child. He says he kept his name off the birth certificate to protect Gus from media attention.

Schreiber, citing section 7613(b) of California’s Family Code, maintains that as a sperm donor, and with no written agreement to the contrary in place before the child’s birth, Patric does not have any parental rights. In addition, Schreiber, through her lawyers, tells Newsweek that she and Patric never agreed to be co-parents, and that Patric never showed any intent of wanting to be the child’s father.

A 29-page letter written sent by Patric in late 2008 or early 2009 to Schreiber portrays a tortured man who ultimately says he’s not ready for fatherhood, but would act as a sperm donor as a “gift” to the woman he had loved, as long as she kept it a secret.

The trial court sided with Schreiber, awarding her full custody of Gus. A Domestic Violence Restraining Order was also issued against Patric by the trial court on November 25, 2013; in an email to Newsweek Schreiber’s legal team says this was in response to past instances of verbal, physical, and emotional abuse (including anti-Semitic remarks) levied by Patric towards Schreiber.

Continue reading “Still the most insidious and evil thing to do to children”

The Alienating Parents’ Tool Of Choice

Persuasive Rhetoric
The Tool of Choice for the Alienating Parent

Emotional Child Abuse - 2016Persuasive Rhetoric refers to using language in an emotionally laden manner with the purpose of convincing the audience of some particular perspective.

Persuasive Rhetoric is a tool for selling ideas, beliefs and positions on a given topic or subject. It is unrelated to truth. It only refers to the spin, the story and the goal of winning over the audience. Nothing in the message requires truth.

saddest-thing-in-the-world-20161In the case of Parental Alienation, this concept is useful in that it describes a favorite modus operandi that the alienating parent uses to vilify the targeted parent.

In this context, the alienating parent will allege something either entirely untrue or grossly distorted regarding the targeted parent. It is done with such emotion and tenacity, that the audience is typically drawn into its message. Then the alienating parent does the same thing with another listener. Now there is a group of three who all believe the same either untrue or grossly distorted thing.

There are now three voices in this chorus, and the intensity level tends to increase with the volume and the numbers of those involved. Then someone in this group of three relates this to another person, who questions it but is told that several other people told them the same thing, so it must be true. This new “convert” to the distortion then unwittingly spreads the distortion to someone else, and to someone else, and to someone else.

Socrates, the story goes, is approached by a man who wants to tell him some urgent news. Before he does this, Socrates stops him and says he would first like to ask him three questions before he tells his story. The man agrees.

The first question is, “do you know the person to whom this news occurred?”

Answer: “No, but I know someone who does know them. “

Question two: “did you witness the event yourself?”

Answer: “No, but I spoke to someone who was there.”

Question Three: ” Is the news good or bad?”

Answer: “It would be considered bad news.”

Socrates reviews accordingly, “You do not know the person to whom this happened, you only heard about it from someone who says they were there, and it is bad news. Thank you, but I think I would rather not listen to this news.”

Rightly or wrongly, we humans do tend to be herd animals. Due to our wiring and our evolution, when the herd is exposed to some message that is potentially dangerous or at least negative, we do tend to give it extra weight, and then pass it on.

This is a self-protective reflex that is easily exploited by the alienating parent in their mission to obliterate the targeted parent in Parental Alienation cases.

http://drbobevans.com/
“There are some who say Parental Alienation is a new concept and should be replaced with other verbiage more grounded in established psychological research. I’m not too sure where this comment is coming from but to help clarify the situation, there are 94 pages of references, peer review articles, books, journal articles and other works that make reference to Parental Alienation and Parental Alienation Syndrome and the phenomenon of alienation some go back to the 1940’s. So it is hardly the case that Parental Alienation is a new concept; clearly it’s not.” ~ www.drbobevans.com

Since the words “Parental Alienation” were first uttered within a family court room, it comes as no surprise that the echoes emanating from adversaries within both the mental health and legal environments have blurred and tarnished the very concept and, at times, left it unrecognizable. The side opposing an assertion of Parental Alienation is tasked with discrediting, disputing and demeaning it, hoping to convince the court to ultimately reject it. The adversarial process within the family court will predictably batter the concept about a good deal. Consequently, much misinformation, partial information and outright untruths and fabrications emerge and begin to fester.

When one considers that arguing attorneys and family law judges typically learn about Parental Alienation via arguments, examinations and cross examinations in court, it should not be surprising that such understandings are usually limited to the facts of a particular case, and are not necessarily characteristic of specific knowledge acquisition. In other words, the understandings about Parental Alienation as born through litigation are anecdotal and unique, far from a balanced and complete instruction. Judges and attorneys may hear about Parental Alienation from expert witnesses who have essentially been hired to discredit it or to assert it, and their information may be distorted or contaminated by the need to persuade (i.e., biased). In other words, the adversarial environment where it is argued is ripe for distortions and partial truths. What is important to know is that there have been specific arguments created to discredit it that can be shown to be absolutely false. For example, the argument that it is not accepted by the professional community can be shown to be absolutely false. The argument about its presence or absence in the DSM-5 can be answered completely and affirmatively. The argument that it is “junk science” can be shown to be completely unsupported by the scientific literature.

Announcing the National Association of Parental Alienation Specialists & 2-Day Symposium “Effective Litigation of Parental Alienation”The two day course offered by NAPAS is designed not only to provide a full and complete picture of parental alienation but to impart practical strategies to attorneys representing either a rejected parent or an alienating parent and the course material is supported by the scientific literature and professional consensus.

Recent Updates

Find Cause Bigger Than Self

About

Fighting to preserve Parent–Child relationships to improve the lives of children and strengthen society by protecting the child’s right to the love and care of both parents after separation/divorce.

“Children’s Rights” is not just about Fathers, it’s also about Children, Mothers, Families, Public Advocacy, Civil Rights and Liberties. This Children’s Rights Facebook Group, Page and Cause have been created for positive outreach, networking, distribution and discussion of information related to our cause.

CHILDREN’S RIGHTS
• A continuing relationship with both parents.

• Be treated not as a piece of property, but as a human being recognized to have unique feelings, ideas, and desires consistent with that of an individual.

• Continuing care and proper guidance from each parent.

• Not to be unduly influenced by either parent to view the other parent differently.

• Express love, friendship, and respect for both parents: freedom from having to hide those stated emotions or made to be ashamed of such.

• An explanation that the impending action of divorce was in no way caused by the child’s actions.

• Not to be the subject and/or source of any and all arguments.

• Continuing, honest feedback with respect to the divorce process and its impact on the changing relationships of the family.

• Maintain regular contact with both parents and a clear explanation for any change in plans and/or cancellations.

• Enjoy a pleasurable relationship with both parents, never to be employed as a manipulative bargaining tool.

• The obligation of being a parent does not end after a divorce.

It is extremely important to understand that the bond of marriage is completely different from that of parents. This is the most common downfall in today’s society, as a dissolution of marriage takes place so does that of parenting.

 

A WORD ABOUT SELF REPRESENTATION ~ The Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution has been interpreted to provide EVERY AMERICAN with the CONSTITUTIONAL right to self-representation, if they so choose. That privilege, like all other constitutional rights, should be enjoyed without fear of harassment, prejudice, or abuse.

Furthermore, no law, regulation, or policy should exist to abridge or surreptitiously extinguish that right. Self-Represented Litigants have no less of a right to FAIR and MEANINGFUL due process under the federal and state constitutions as those individuals who choose to utilize an attorney for their legal affairs and issues. In fact, NOWHERE in any state or federal constitution does it specify that the hiring of a lawyer is a prerequisite to exercising one’s due process rights.

Democratic principles dictate that we have the right to freely choose between self-representation and hiring a lawyer to handle our legal matters without suffering humiliation, prejudice, or penalization. After all, it is the parties to the litigation that ultimately have to deal with the consequences of the case’s outcome, and not the judge or the lawyers involved in the matter.

Contrary to the view of certain judges and lawyers, those who opt to litigate their own legal matters without an attorney are NOT second-class citizens deserving of contempt and injustice. Instead, they are BRAVE CITIZENS with an inalienable right to have their legal causes adjudicated objectively and justly — with or without a lawyer.

Self-representation can be a difficult, time-consuming, and often frightening experience, especially for those burdened by demanding work schedules, family responsibilities, and other obligations of day-to-day living.

Accordingly, those who engage in the difficult task of self-litigation should be REVERED for their COURAGE and DEDICATION, not scorned or abused.

We also need to amass momentous opposition against those persons, agencies, and institutions who, in the interest of protecting huge profits, careers, and prestige, subject self-litigants to a hostile and often abusive litigation atmosphere calculated to suppress self-representation and force people to become completely and financially dependent on lawyers to gain “paid” access to a taxpayer-funded legal system.

http://www.iloveandneedmydaughter.blogspot.com

 

Be the first to know when FFCA Live opens for our National Families and Fathers 17th Annual Conference, and stay up-to-date on on other news and promotions.

This week, we will announce our full online conference schedule… Over the past several years, we hosted virtual attendees from Japan to Ireland, Pakistan to Colombia, Russia to Africa, Hawaii to Brazil, Australia to America and of over 90 nations!

2016, Can’t make it to the conference this year? No problem! You can watch every session — including Q&A’s, plenary sessions, workshops and other exclusive content — on-demand from the comfort of your office or living room…

Sign up for FFCA Live email updates and RegisterFeatures

  • High-definition live stream with pause / rewind capability
  • An archive of all your conference passes for future on-demand viewing of all sessions
  • A PDF of the official conference program guide.
  • PowerPoints from all sessions
  • Q&A for all workshops and through our eVerfication
  • Attendance Certificate

malicious-mom-syndrome-2015

contact-denial-is-child-abuse-20161

Dr. Jennifer Kane, sociologist at the University of North Carolina, discusses her recent study regarding the non-monetary support provided by low-income non-custodial fathers and how the research further debunks the deadbeat dad myth.

Title IVe Fraud Investigation Demand Letter Delivery to COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM.

no2bgreater2bheartbreak2b-2b2015

Linda Gottlieb Quote Parental Alienation - 2015

parental2balienation2baka2bchild2babuse2bis2ba2bcrime2b-2b2016

Stop Emotional Child Abuse - 2015

CONTACT DENIAL IS CHILD ABUSE - STAND UP FOR ZORAYA - 2016

Child support needs to catch up to reflect new roles for fathers, say experts

Why should a custodial parent be allowed to deny access to the other parent?

Child Visitation Hits the Internet

Fatherlessness is the root cause of at least 20 other social problems.

Children Need Both Parents

Family Court Stress Disorder (PTSD)…

Malachi’s Law ” We The Families

Stop Child Abuse for Profit Cause

A Year Without My Daughter Zoraya. Here’s to you Judge Valerie Manno-Schurr.

Would you support social security title IV D and family law reform? Asks ChangePolitics

The rights that children have to free and equal association with both fit parents…

…that should not be invaded by the State or infringed upon by another parent.Do you believe in Dads - 2016

NO…STILL DON’T SEE THE PROBLEM?

THINK THIS IS NOT TRUE?

WATCH THIS VIDEO ABOUT HOW FATHERS IN MIAMI-DADE COUNTY‘S 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT FAMILY COURT, IN FLORIDA,  HAVE TO “UNJUSTIFIABLY” PROVE “PARENTAL FITNESS”

The CEO of The Fatherhood Taskforce speaking before the Florida Supreme Court Committee on the Future of Florida‘s Courts.

How Divorced Parents and Children Lose Their Rights

Emery makes many good suggestions in his article called, “How Divorced Parents Lost Their Rights” and has a good grasp on the process from a psychology perspective. We are, of course constitutional scholars and would like to offer a perspective that hopefully integrates and supports most but not all of what Emery says.Source: Laumann-Billings, L. &. Emery, R.E. (2000). Distress among young adults from divorced families. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 671-687.

For instance Emery suggests that courts do not involve themselves with parenting disagreements between married parents because judges would make things a mess.

They would of course  but that is NOT the legal reason that they stay out of it. The legal reason is that people have the right to make decisions free from government interference. These rights are called privacy rights. Parents have privacy rights to make decisions for their children and the State may not interfere unless the state can show a clear and present danger to the child from these decisions.

Why do family law courts treat married and divorced parents differently? Many people do not realize that parental rights do not depend on marriage and in fact cannot depend on marital status in any way. A hundred years ago this wasn’t so and our family law codes have not caught up with this concept. Up until the early 1970s some states still had bastardy laws on their books that tied the rights of parents and children to the marital status of the child’s parents. In a series of landmark decisions, the US Supreme Court stated very clearly that states may not create second-class parents or second-class children based on nothing more than the marital status of the child’s parents.

Family law has not caught up to this idea because of religious and cultural preconditioning. In other words our society builds into us a series of biases and prejudices against single and divorced parents that is so deep most people don’t even realize it is driving their behavior. Most people believe that it is completely legitimate to invade the privacy of single/divorced parents even where they believe that the privacy of married parents must be preserved.

Constitutionally, this is a completely bankrupt idea. Unfortunately, judges, attorneys, and mental health professionals are almost universally so caught up in these biases they refuse to acknowledge their professional training and simply default to bigoted behaviors without even realizing that is what they are doing. (It’s easy to fall into following statistics to guide decisions. Individuals can choose to follow these as their guide. It is not how the law should be deciding individual rights.)

– See more

Continue reading “The rights that children have to free and equal association with both fit parents…”

World4Justice · Cyber Protest · 2016

family-court-is-where-you-pay-and-pay-2016

January 16January 29  –  Jan 16 at 12:05 AM to Jan 29 at 3:05 AM in UTC

WORLDWIDE!

Target 2016 to make as many e-mail, phone in and snail mail correspondence with the politicians as possible to see who puts Family Justice and Child Welfare at the top of their political agenda! So e-mail, write and call a radio call in TODAY!

Purple Keyboard Campaign 4 Family Justice Law Reform - 2015

Florida Election Topic 2015
Removing the winner-gets-the-kids concept would also remove the incentive for parents to focus on each other’s faults, and to “dig up dirt” on each other. It may not be reasonable to expect divorcees to co-parent blissfully, without conflict, but getting off to a less acrimonious start, one that encourages cooperation rather than competition, would certainly seem to have a greater chance of serving the interests of children than the existing system has.

Continue reading “World4Justice · Cyber Protest · 2016”

Why won’t the Judge let me see my Daddy

I Love You Zoey - 2016

Can a Custodial Parent Ever Deny Visitation?

Visitation rights are taken seriously by courts, as it is generally felt that it is in the best interest of the child to spend time with both parents. Because of the importance that courts place on the child’s best interest when determining custody arrangements, child visitation rights can rarely, if ever be legally denied by the custodial parent.Project Fatherhood FL 6- 2015

The denial of child visitation rights are most commonly thought of as situations in which a custodial parent blatantly refuses to allow the non-custodial parent to see the child. A typical example of this scenario would be when the custodial parent, who has full custody of the son, refuses to let the son get into his other parent’s car when arrangements were made to come to pick him up for his visitation period. However, visitation rights can also be illegally denied in more subtle ways.2015-02-05 22.40.38

Facebook.com/StandupforZoraya
Facebook.com/StandupforZoraya

For example, it is also illegal for a custodial parent to refuse visitation rights on the basis that they don’t like the non-custodial parent’s significant other; the child is sick; the child is visiting relatives; the child is out of town or at another scheduled activity; or for almost any other basis. Further, in cases where there is an emergency just before a scheduled visitation, such as when the child must be taken to the hospital, the noncustodial parent should be notified so that they may visit the child there.

Can visitation be denied to a non-custodial parents?

A denial of visitation rights by the custodial parent to a non-custodial parent, absent a change in an existing court order for visitation rights, is illegal. This is true both in situations in which the parents have agreed on a parenting plan outside of court, and in situations in which scheduled visitation has been ordered by the court. The legal phrase for this scenario is called frustration of child visitation rights, and in many states this can be cause to change the court-ordered child custody arrangement and hold the custodial parent in contempt of court.

What if the Non-Custodial Parent is Behind on Support Payments?

No you can't see your daughter - 2016

Continue reading “Why won’t the Judge let me see my Daddy”

Stop Family Court Kidnapping

Dysfunctional Family Courts 2 - 2015

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

You are Disgusting - 2016Stand up for Zoraya - Causes Personal Campaign by Diana - 2015Every debate from now on should promise to ask a real question about Family Law Reform; 50/50 Parenting Plans!!!

– Justice is a concept of moral rightness based on ethics, rationality, law,natural law, religion, equity or fairness, as well as the administration of the law, taking into account the inalienable and inborn rights of all human beings and citizens…

Parental alienation is real. It’s been real for a long time. It may take time for the mental health community to go through the red tape of getting the words right so they cover their own butts and figure out how they mutually agree on treatment so they will be paid for it, but it’s there nonetheless. Parental Alienation like many other things in this world is caught up in the red tape of humanity while good parents and children suffer and families are destroyed.

“It’s Constitutional! Discussing Constitution and Family Law Reform.” — See~~>http://sco.lt/6t4kJF

If you’re concerned about Crime and Delinquency then you should be concerned with the Reform of the Family Courts in America. Here’s why ~ According to the Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, “The most reliable indicator of violent crime in a community is the proportion of fatherless families. Fatherless families, in turn, are caused in part by family courts that exclude fathers from post-divorce parenting. By instituting shared parenting after divorce or separation, fathers would be allowed to continue to show their sons the right way to grow into manhood.” ~AND~ In the release, Dr. Ned Holstein, founder and board chair of National Parents Organization said: “Unfortunately, however, our nation’s family courts prevent millions of divorced and separated fathers from having meaningful relationships with their children, which only leave their children more vulnerable to this unfortunate behavior.”

That’s why EVERY Presidential Debate MUST discuss the Family Courts in America and how to fix it.

~ iloveandneedmydaughter.blogspot.com

Eu

Go Fund Me 1 - Stand up for Zoraya - 2015PERSONAL CAMPAIGN

Jose Rodriguez

Jose is gathering 875 signatures to Stop Court’s Denial Of Reasonable Parent/Child Contact

Dear Honorable Jack Reed- Family-Friends, Family Court Reform: It matters to me because lawless america is all about exposing the fact that we now live in Lawless America. We no longer have laws that are enforced because judges do whatever they want to do. America has also become lawless because government officials are dishonest and/or corrupt. Millions of victims never realized what happen to them In court. I began to research and the more I began to look at the statutes in what was going on in our judicial branch, I began to see that there were some real problems that we have in our branch of government and the judiciary.Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness were promised to each of us by our founding fathers. And the resulting legal system was intended to protect us and sustain us with reason, fairness and order. But the present state of family law makes this harder and harder to achieve – particularly in regards to fathers rights and visitation rights,Arbitrary laws and a confrontational legal system have created a litigious nightmare for many of us. I m motivated to joining the cause defending our fatherhood In a broken Family Law System. American fathers are led down a primes path everyday In our family courts, often with disastrous legal results. Fathers wind up In the land of Gender Bias, where we are systematically stripped of our rights, often without the slightest Idea of why It Is happening to us. Courts are supposed to approach cases of child custody , support payments, visitation rights In what we call a gender-neutral posture. It sounds fair, and It Is fair. Judges are not enforcing these gender laws fairly, and few seem to care. We have and will continue more of these problems until proud fathers like me organize and speak up to demand fair treatment . We have a legitimate legal Issue and we need to make It public our concerns a public Issue. We need the courts to hear us.

PERSONAL CAMPAIGN

Cherish Jongquist

Cherish is gathering 500 signatures to Stop Court’s Denial Of Reasonable Parent/Child Contact

I have 3 boys one being a single father who is 19. I didn’t know how horrible the “system” is against fathers. My son signed the voluntary paternity acknowledgement as soon as the “courts” allowed him to do so. He has been involved in EVERY aspect of his child life from the moment he found out he was going to be a father at the age of 15. He finished High School and graduated at age 16, started college at age 17. For the first 3 months of his child’s life HE was the one who woke up with him in the night for the feedings, diaper changes and all the other reasons a baby wakes up in the middle of the night. He did this for HIS SON, because he loves him and because he wanted what was best for his son’s mother who was still in high school. He wanted to make sure she got the sleep she needed so she could do well in school and graduate. He did this not necessarily for her or to make her life easier but, he did this for his SON, so his son who was a child of teenagers could have both of his parents with at least a high school diploma. When he and his sons mother broke up, they agreed on a 50/50 custody and placement. For the last 18 months this is what he and the mother did. One week with one parent the next week with the other parent. CPS got involved because his son kept getting critically hurt in her care. They found enough evidence to charge her with 3 counts of neglect, and more than probable cause to charge her father (who is a 2nd degree sex offender) with sexual assault of my sons 2 1/2 year old. When my son disagreed with the “informal disposition agreement” and the “safety plan” and the “obligations” of this agreement, which it clearly states “the child and parents, guardian and legal custodian are notified of their right to object at any time to the facts or terms of this agreement. If there are objections, the intake worker may alter the terms of the agreement or recommend that a petition be filed…..” My son did disagree with the terms or “obligations” and rather than his concerns being addressed, the caseworker signed the back where he was supposed to sign “Father refuses to sign” The mother of his child has been and is working with a “parent aide” and she gave her the name of an attorney to talk to about her rights to the child. In Wisconsin and in almost EVERY state in the USA a father has NO rights when a child is born out of wed lock. The only rights he has is to sign the paternity acknowledgment and then hire an attorney and spend thousands of dollars to open a custody case so he can have LEGAL shared custody and placement. Until there is such an order an unwed mother can refuse at any point to allow her child’s father the right to see his own child or children. There are laws in place stating that it against the law to discriminate people based on race, sex, sexual orientation, so on and so forth, HOWEVER, this same law does not hold true to family law. Yes the FATHER has the right to file a petition for custody/placement, BUT the MOTHER does NOT have to do this to have custody/placement of the SAME child. This law needs to change, it needs to be equal, I believe there are MANY fathers labeled “deadbeat dads” because they end up not being able to keep affording to go to court and hire attorneys and fight for their children. We the people need to plead with our legislature’s to change this sexist and biased law. Please sign this petition for this state and every state, to make changes that are more fair not for the mothers or the fathers BUT for the innocent CHILDREN that deserve to have equal time and love from BOTH parents!!!

PERSONAL CAMPAIGN

Rolando Carcases

Rolando is gathering 10 signatures to Stop Court’s Denial Of Reasonable Parent/Child Contact

I’m a victim of the 9th judicial circuit for in Osceola County, FL whom put me in a highly child support calculated with a job application job that I never get so I never couldn’t pay the $866.13 and the child support enforcement unit suspended my driver license. (License that I depend) because I’m a truck driver and one of this suspension lasted almost 3 months and I lost my job and so on.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Judicial ethics and discipline

A lack of impartiality is evident when a judge takes a party’s appeal personally or over-reacts to a motion to disqualify.  For example, the Nebraska Supreme Court sanctioned behavior that disclosed a judge’s “unhealthy and wholly improper concern with the protection of her own rulings from appellate reversal.”

When a judge becomes embroiled in a controversy, the line between the judge and the controversy before the court becomes blurred, and the judge’s impartiality or appearance of impartiality may become compromised. . . .  The responsibility of a judge is to decide matters that have been submitted to the court by the parties.  The judge may not, having decided a case, advocate for or . . . materially assist one party at the expense of the other.  Such advocacy creates the appearance, and perhaps the reality, of partiality on the part of the judge.  This, in turn, erodes public confidence in…

View original post 976 more words

STAND UP

“Changing a child last name (away from the father’s) is an act of venom”
“Changing a child last name (away from the father’s) is an act of venom”

PLEASE HELP ZORAYA Children need both parents to be involved in their lives even when parents don't live together anymore!
PLEASE HELP ZORAYA
Children need both parents to be involved in their lives even when parents don’t live together anymore!

Find Court Qualified “Supervised Visitation Monitor” – Once a week (for one hour) in Miami-Dade or Broward County. As Ordered by Judge Manno-Schurr on February 2nd, 2015. WILL PAY – Contact Stuart H. Abramson, Attorney at Law at (305) 270-7796

CONTACT DENIAL IS CHILD ABUSE - STAND UP FOR ZORAYA - 2016

This Father’s Day, and every day, all across America, there are children who are being denied access to their fathers, and most of these fathers were in their children’s lives prior.

People must awaken to the truth and the horrors of family law and see how it’s the other parent and the family courts that have bankrupted and broken them down.

Changes must be made to these systems so the court-induced parental alienation immediately ceases from them doing more harm to our children.

921df-male2bequality

 

How is it in the best interests of our children that their fathers’ driver licenses are suspended, and they are eventually thrown in jail for inability to pay?parental2balienation2b-2b2016

Here are fathers who are already broke, bankrupted, and brokenhearted and now without any ability to pay, they order him to pay or go to jail.

Where is someone supposed to come up with that kind of money when they’ve lost everything? Tell me, people. How is this in the best interests of our kids? (Yes, I am not disputing that there are some parents who don’t deserve to be parents — moms and dads.)

But most often, these are loving, “fit” fathers who have been engineered by a system designed to break them down in every way, until all they can do is run.

They are hopeless and the cycle then goes on! What happens to them when they run? They become despondent and commit suicide, like Chris Mackney, or get shot at, like Walter Scott!

Does it make sense to suspend a parent’s drivers license so now they can’t work, can’t get money to pay?

Does it make sense to throw a parent in jail because of an inability to pay, so that while he’s locked up his arrears get worse?

It’s up to us to break the cycle!

Tina Granstrom

Palmetto

Read more hereCRF LOGO3

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Child Custody Arrangements News

stand1stand2

Make The Right Choices For Your Children  http://www.childcustodyarrangements.com/

View original post

One Day

CONTACT DENIAL IS CHILD ABUSE - STAND UP FOR ZORAYA - 2016Talking about Parental Alienation - - Where'd my Daddy go?

This Father’s Day, and every day, all across America, there are children who are being denied access to their fathers, and most of these fathers were in their children’s lives prior.

People must awaken to the truth and the horrors of family law and see how it’s the other parent and the family courts that have bankrupted and broken them down.

Changes must be made to these systems so the court-induced parental alienation immediately ceases from them doing more harm to our children.

How is it in the best interests of our children that their fathers’ driver licenses are suspended, and they are eventually thrown in jail for inability to pay?

Here are fathers who are already broke, bankrupted, and brokenhearted and now without any ability to pay, they order him to pay or go to jail.

Where is someone supposed to come up with that kind of money when they’ve lost everything? Tell me, people. How is this in the best interests of our kids? (Yes, I am not disputing that there are some parents who don’t deserve to be parents — moms and dads.)

But most often, these are loving, “fit” fathers who have been engineered by a system designed to break them down in every way, until all they can do is run.

They are hopeless and the cycle then goes on! What happens to them when they run? They become despondent and commit suicide, like Chris Mackney, or get shot at, like Walter Scott!

Does it make sense to suspend a parent’s drivers license so now they can’t work, can’t get money to pay?

Does it make sense to throw a parent in jail because of an inability to pay, so that while he’s locked up his arrears get worse?

It’s up to us to break the cycle!

Tina Granstrom

Palmetto

Read more hereWith out a father - 2015cropped-contact-denial-is-child-abuse-2016.jpg

the-pink-slip-project-20165Learn how this Family Court System is injuring this father and child.

PAS Monkeys - 2016

PLEASE HELP ZORAYA Children need both parents to be involved in their lives even when parents don't live together anymore!
PLEASE HELP ZORAYA
Children need both parents to be involved in their lives even when parents don’t live together anymore!
Broward County Public School conspires with Judge Manno-Schurr to enable Parental Alienation, a severe form of child abuse.
Broward County Public School conspires with Judge Manno-Schurr to enable Parental Alienation, a severe form of child abuse.

Find Court Qualified “Supervised Visitation Monitor” – Once a week (for one hour) in Miami-Dade or Broward County. As Ordered by Judge Manno-Schurr on February 2nd, 2015. WILL PAY – Contact Stuart H. Abramson, Attorney at Law at (305) 270-7796

Related articles

Grandparent Support

PLEASE JOIN THE BLANKET AWARENESS CAMPAIGN

View original post

Criminalizing Parental Alienation – Petition To Chief Judge Bertila Soto

American Fathers Liberation Army

 “My children are a gift that God gave me. The state did not receive those children from God and then forward them on to… Posted by American Fathers Liberation Army

Preponderance of Evidence Standard. Did your Chief Judge ignore Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice’s Administrative… Posted by American Fathers Liberation Army

Civil Rights are violated, Human Rights are violated; and the United States Constitution is not on the agenda. causes.com —… Posted by American Fathers Liberation Army

The World’s Largest

W r i t e O N E L e t t e r

Worldwide Event!

The injustice of the Family Court System, and it’s agencies that are supposed to help…Read More

Purple Keyboard Campaign 4 Family Justice Law Reform - 2015

“Justice is the most sacred part and the most incomparably binding part of morality.”

“Justice is a part of the human makeup. And if you deprive a person of Justice on a continuous basis, it’s really an attack (and not to get religious or anything) but it’s an attack on the human soul. We have, as societies, evolved ideas of Justice and we have done that because human nature needs Justice and it needs resolution. And if you deprive somebody of that long enough they’re going to have reactions…”
~ Juli T. Star-Alexander – Executive Director, Redress, Inc.

Family Court is a MAFIA - Child Trafficking - 2016

Please friends, help us reach as many as we possibly can on this Demand for Reform. This is for the assistance, support, and justice which are often denied because the alienating parents we have lived with, the one who haunts our being, they still hold us captive AND ARE enabled by family court terrorist. This isn’t so much about what’s happened to us, but it is most certainly about what could happen to our children and how our entire system will view what is needed to help these potential victims and hopefully survivors find a recovery process that helps them to live on in happiness.

These family court terrorist don’t realize and will never accept responsibility for their actions, so it is up to US, all persons, to free ourselves from these monstrous controllers.

Please help and pass this forward, ask those who have been harmed, those who fight for the abused, those who speak up for the RIGHTS OF ALL LIVING BEINGS; we need to see inside these horrific abuses in our homes and the lifelong pains of those who have endured any interaction with Florida’s Family Court.

We only support organizations who show an understanding that children need both parents, and that either parent is equally capable of the choice to perpetrate hate or declare peace.