Family Court Judges Abuse and are Punishing Men, their Children, and their Families.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Children’s Rights –

Consider the great message it sends to your child if they can see you and your ex put your differences aside to make sure they are brought up in the best environment possible. 

The child will receive a very personal lesson on the importance of compromise and cooperation.

More importantly, they’ll witness how much both parents care about…

Florida Family Court

Judge Manno-Schurr
Unjustly Denies Un-Wed Bio-Dad Access to Daughter

Children’s Rights

Have you been falsely accused or wrongly prosecuted for domestic violence?

False allegations and wrongful prosecutions harm the innocent, squander resources, and shortchange true victims.

1. Connect: Facebook
2. Tip sheets: How to Avoid and Survive a Domestic Violence False Allegation – Before the Accusation – If a Restraining Order is Served on You – Defending the Allegation – Immigration – Working for Change
3. National survey: One in Ten Falsely Accused of Abuse
4. False Allegations Awareness Month

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

They must be blind. We must help them to see. ~Mark “But again, why that one age group? It’s not clear. But that is a particularly tough time in life to suffer a serious financial setback or a debilitating health problem, noted John Phillips, who oversees some of the National Institute on Aging’s funding of research into what affects aging and health. The institute funded the study. “You’re supposed to be heading into your prime earning years, and far from being able to collect retirement benefits,” he said. A job loss or other long-lasting hardship can be very hard to cope with, he added.” Source: FoxNews.com/Health   Fox News  … more »

Related articles

• Florida legislators have been asked to look into reforms to help husbands who claim they have been victims of false domestic violence injunctions.
• Psalm 41
• Do you know why kids without Dads are at a BIG DISADVANTAGE ?
• A father’s fight to get his daughter secretly put up for adoption back
• COURT ENABLED PARENTAL ALIENATION IS CHILD ABUSE ~~ NO CONTACT SINCE JANUARY 24th, 2015 ~~ #StandupforZoraya
• Hold Family Courts Accountable
• Divorced Co-Parenting Oxymoron
• Judicial Accountability for Court Ordered Parental Alienation
• Judicial Elections 2016 – Update
• The Role of Domestic Violence in Parental Alienation

The Long Term Effects of Parental Alienation

I’m sure this is a subject which was expected by anyone who knows what Larry has been through over the past 35 years.

“The more a parent sees himself or herself as a victim, the greater the possibility that he or she will go after the child’s relationship with ex. And once they do, there is often no limit to their efforts. They will falsely accuse and malign everything associated with their ex, and will manipulate the child like a puppet. In short, they have little to no boundaries. They will spill anything damning– both truths and lies– into the child’s soul. So can you blame the child, who loves this parent unconditionally, for believing the messages being heard?”

Any expert will agree that the first thing parents need to do is put their feelings aside and think about what is best for the children. You never, ever, ever use…

View original post 247 more words

Estrangement, Alienation, Denial of Contact, Isolation…All Child Abuse

“There are subtle ways and overt ways of alienating a child from a parent, but either way it’s evil”

PAS Caselaw Update 2016

Implications of Parental Alienation Research for Family-Based Intervention

Recent Advances in Understanding Parental Alienation

Beware of Custody Evaluations UpToParents – 2016

Letting Go – Stop Emotional Child Abuse 2016

What Exactly Is “The Best Interest of the Child”?

What Exactly Is ‘The Best Interest of the Child?’

The Essential Needs of Children After Parental Divorce

The Metaphysical Needs of Children After Parental Divorce

via ESTRANGEMENT.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Related articles

• COURT ENABLED PARENTAL ALIENATION IS CHILD ABUSE ~~ NO CONTACT SINCE JANUARY 24th, 2015 ~~ #StandupforZoraya
• Criminalize Parental Alienation ~ 3 STRIKES FELONY
• TLB Radio: 4 Family Justice – Parent Alienation
• Lawyers. Court. Processes. Frustration. Please help.
• Children should not be allowed to drive the visitation bus!
• The Family Law Reform Advocacy Group, said “the change is long overdue”.
• Which is worse? No Child Support or No Contact
• Stop Child Abuse for Profit Cause
• The Role of Domestic Violence in Parental Alienation
• Emotional abuse is traumatic, and not enough is being done about stopping it! How bad is it?

Parental Alienation Childhood Trauma

PAS Caselaw Update – 2016

The victims of psychological maltreatment suffered from anxiety, depression, low self-esteem, post-traumatic stress disorder, and suicidal tendencies at the same rate — and in some cases, an even greater rate — than those physically or sexually abused. Joseph Spinazzola, who lead the study, points out that since psychological abuse has no physical wounds associated with it, child protective case workers have a particularly hard time recognizing it. Are you — or anyone you know — the victim of psychological abuse or neglect?  We welcome you to share your experiences in the comments section below.

My research in social media led me to conclude a large population of parents lie about being victims of parental alienation. In an experiment I offered several opportunities to thousands of parents ( claiming to be victims of parental alienation ) a chance to take full ad- vantage of free consultations and free video conferences, on the subject of parental alienation. The tracked response confirmed only 5% of the members of these social media groups accepted the free offers.

The social media groups included more than twenty groups claiming to be support groups or advocates for recognition of parental alienation; in addition other groups correlated to high conflict divorce with children were pooled into the social media population including: Father Rights Organizations, Step Parenting groups, Blended Family Support Groups, Support Groups for Personality Disordered Relationship Survivors and the population included non-custodial parent groups. . This low response rate helps to validate that many of the parents joining these social media sites -claiming to be victims of an alienating parent or – claiming that their children are victims of parental alienation – have not been truthful, in addition, the high statistical result for non-reactive parents ( 95% ) supports the finding that these non-reactive parents, do not match up with the profile of a targeted parent.

A targeted parent with an alienated child would not turn down a free consultation to receive support for themselves and for their children. Nor would a true targeted parent refuse to accept an offer to receive access to free online video conferences specifically about the subject of parental alienation. Nor would targeted parents turn down offers to help them with opportunities to repair a lost / damaged relationship with their child(ren). The statistical data validates that parents are lying about being victims of parental alienation and they are lying about having children- who are victims of alienation.

Parental Alienation is Child Abuse from Childrens Rights Florida

Family Justice ~ True Parental Alienation Stories

And someday she will know the truth.

Can you tell your story one more time? – 100’s of true Parental Alienation stories.

Nathan Abbey‎ on Children’s Rights~

Today I find an apartment, at a price perfect for when maintenance ends next month, a block from the school of one of my daughters and in the same district as the other– I could drive her (the younger of the girls) there on the way to work.

The younger messages her mom about the apartment and the school thing, because she’s been upset about having to switch schools and losing her friends. I shouldn’t have brought up the school thing. It rose hopes of stability that had little chance of being realized.

You can guess the mother’s proposition– given to my younger, 9 y/o daughter.

If I drive both girls, every day, to both schools, at their different arrival and dismissal times, then sure.

So, it’s on me. I can quit my job and become a school bus driver, or the girls switch schools.

The “concession” to which I alluded in my earlier post here was my “giving” their mother full legal custody. Please don’t lecture me on what an unwise decision this was. The judge was not going to award joint custody when the mother refuses to talk to the father. The father, who had an order of protection in place for “harassing” the wife about WHY she kicked him out– he’s gonna win a custody battle?

No, he’s not. And he’s not going to put his kids through it.

So, they suffer. Not just this school bullshit. Everything.

The older one tells me she asked her mom why we split up. The mom answered, “you’ll understand one day.”

I hope she does understand one day.

Maybe she can tell me.

I hope it’s something better than “sometimes mommies get bored with daddies and put their own needs above those of their children.” 

Spike Gardner on ‎American Fathers Liberation Army (AFLA) ~ Before I could see no resolve and even felt it was better to completely eliminate an abusive parent. Now I see the abuse can be defused by minimizing hostility with equality. A mandatory 50/50-6 months on/6 months off. Only 1 mandatory exchange every 6 months at custody transfer!

Having the authority to say what is and isn’t acceptable in your child’s life should be a custodial parent’s personal choice not to be infringed by court orders unless criminal activity is identified.

**NOBODY SHOULD BE COURT ORDERED TO BE EXPOSED TO AN ABUSER-NOT A MAN, WOMEN OR A CHILD!  ***A PARENT SHOULD NEVER FEEL AS THOUGH THEY CAN NOT PROTECT THEIR CHILD DURING THEIR OWN CUSTODIAL PARENTING TIME.

‎Children’s Rights ~ SAVE for Falsely Accused:

“If someone is falsely accused of a crime, pleads not guilty, & the charges are dismissed, he/she may be able to file suit against the person who brought the charges. E.g., if a private citizen files a false criminal charge against another person or falsely makes a complaint to a police officer that results in another’s arrest, and if no conviction results, the accused may sue the accuser for malicious prosecution.”

SAVE Domestic Violence Legislative Project – Good intentions gone wrong, SURVEY~

In recent years, many abuse shelters have removed requirements for persons to provide evidence of domestic violence in order to receive shelter services. Problem is, there are many more homeless women than victims of battering.

Soon word got out, if you need a place to sack out for a few weeks, just come up with a convincing abuse story, and you’re in the door. And not surprisingly, many shelters are now filled with homeless and drug-abusing women – in the DC area, the average waiting time to get into a shelter is 3 months.

As a result, true victims of physical violence have found it increasingly difficult to obtain the services and protections they need. To say they are disillusioned and angry is an understatement. (To see eye-opening accounts by these victims, visit this Facebook Page.  In addition, we have created a new class of victims, the falsely accused, who find their reputations, assets, and careers harmed.

SAVE believes the solution to this unacceptable state of affairs is to re-establish requirements for evidence of abuse. So we are conducting an informal survey, asking these 2 questions:

1.      What type of evidence should be considered acceptable? Eg. Police reports, medical records, cell phone photographs, reliable eyewitness accounts, etc.

2.      Are there any forms of evidence that should not be considered acceptable?

Dr. Glenn Ross Caddy on ‎Children’s Rights~ I am not sure who nominated me to this group but I welcome the nomination and am pleased to participate. I am an expert in high conflict divorce and parental alienation. I work nationally [U.S.] and also internationally [mainly England, Canada and Australia]. My base is in Fort Lauderdale, Florida [9545475100]. I am easily googled. If I can be of assistance to anyone please feel free to contact me. Glenn Ross Caddy Ph.D.

Linda Gottlieb Kase LMFT LCSW on ‎Children’s Rights ~ The “expert” witness and the therapist that the alienator hires is generally a psychologist, who not have expertise in family dynamics unless specialized training above and beyond the Ph.D training is obtained. To disqualify the “expert,” the following questions could be asked at trial:

In your professional opinion, on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest, what is the influence of parents on children prior to adolescence? (this should be a high #, and if not, the expert/therapist should be asked to justify a low # eg. who has the great influences.)

And after adolescence? (this should be a relatively high # at least)

Do you believe that parental conflict generally has an adverse effect on children and/or causes the child to react negatively in response? Please rate that effect on a scale of 1-10. (this should be a high #, as even the lay person would acknowledge the impact of parental hostility on children. If the expert doesn’t give a high #, he/she should be asked to justify the answer.)

So you would (or would not—depending on prior answers) agree with Christopher Barden, PhD., JD., who has received 2 national research awards in psychology and a law degree with honors from Harvard Law school, when he stated, “There can be no credible controversy about the power of parents to influence children.” (The International Handbook of Parental Alienation Syndrome, p. 420)?

Would you also agree with Barden when he stated that custody cases require “the critical obligation to carefully review the influence of parents, therapists or other adults on the attitudes, beliefs and memories of children.” (pp. 419-432)?

Could you describe what some of these effects are?

Can you give some examples as to how children get caught up in their parents’ conflicts.

You have just confirmed that you recognize the great influence of parents on children as well as the detrimental affects on children due to being exposed to the parental conflict. Yet I did not hear you express how you acquired your expertise in family dynamics. In fact, is it true that you are not licensed in your state of X as a Marriage and Family Therapist?

Can you state what training in family dynamics you had in your education for your psychology degree? (I can confirm that they had no more than family therapy 101, IF they had that at all. The LMFT degree, in virtually all states, requires 60 credits, including 2 internships in the provision of family therapy services.)

Are you aware of your X State’s criteria for obtaining this expertise and being qualified as a specialist for the licensing of a marriage and family therapist. How much of that criteria do you meet?

So could you please state how you are qualified as an expert in assessing family dynamics as well as the adverse effects on children resulting from the dysfunctional parental dyad?

What has been your experience in the treatment of families?

What is the difference between individual therapy and family therapy?

What % do you practice in family therapy and in individual therapy?

How many families have you treated?

How do you justify individual treatment of the child outside of assessing the influence of the parental conflicts on the child?

Have you published books and/or articles on family therapy?

Are the X children being reared in a family?

Could the behaviors and reactions of the children in this case be indicative of being triangled into the parental conflicts?

What causes the symptoms for which you are treating the X children? (Individual therapists will be unable to account for the causes of a child symptoms because there is no empirical evidence for the existence of intra-psychic or biochemical disorders. A family therapist, on the other hand, has much empirical evidence as a family’s therapist can see how the child negatively reacts to the parents’ arguing when observing the family in the session.)

What is your empirical evidence for the causes you have just expressed?

Could you describe any parental interactions which have affected the children in this case?

Do you know how the discipline of family therapy labels the family interactional pattern which puts children in the middle of the parental disputes?

(It is called triangulation. Child psychiatrist, Murray Bowen, labeled it the “pathological triangle. ” Indeed, Bowen and was so convinced about the family’s role in creating and maintaining the child’s symptoms, that when he hospitalized the child, he also hospitalized the entire nuclear family.)

Are you aware, Dr. X, that the psychiatrist, Murray Bowen, was so convinced that the parents’ conflict and this triangulation was at the root of the child’s symptoms so that when he hospitalized a child, he simultaneously hospitalized the entire nuclear family?

Have you heard of child psychiatrist, Salvador Minuchin? (In 2007, he was rated by a research study of therapists as being one of the 10 most influential therapists in the history of psychotherapy. He has written more than 11 books on family therapy. There would not be even a single person trained in family therapy or child psychiatry who has not heard of him.)

Do you know what Dr. Minuchin stated about the adverse effects of triangulation on children? (He asserted that it is the basis of virtually all dysfunctional family relationships adversely affecting children, and the concept of triangulation can be readily found in his book entitled, Family Therapy Techniques, 1981. Dr. M actually labeled this triangulation as a cross-generational alliance between the child and a parent who is in conflict with the other parent. This is the key interactional pattern in the PAS family.)

So as you confirmed that the X children are being reared in a family, on what basis do you claim your expertise to justify making recommendations for the X children regarding their relationship with their targeted/alienated parent?

You really don’t have any expertise in family dynamics, do you, to make any assessments and recommendations for the X children and their parental relationships?

You testified that the children in this case have reservations about, fear of, and hatred for their targeted/alienated parent. Can say with any certainty that they were not influenced by their other parent?

How does the pathological triangle or family dynamics in this case influence what the children say and do?

Do you believe that children the age of the X children are cognitively competent and emotionally mature enough to make decisions in their own best interests?

What does Piaget state about the cognitive development of a child the age of: (give age of each child). ——Until the age of adolescence, children do not have the ability to think for themselves, and abstract thinking only begins at age 13. (Piaget wrote the bible on the development of epistemology in children as follows:

0-2 sensorimotor

2-7 preoperational

7-12 concrete operational

13-adulthood formal operational = abstract thinking.

Given the immature level of these children’s cognitive abilities, how do you distinguish the alienating parent’s influence on them their own ideas and feelings?

Can you rule out with any certainty that the alienating parent is not influencing them adversely against their targeted/alienated parent?

Have you observed the interactions between the children and their targeted/alienated parent?

How can you diagnose for a relationship you have never or virtually never observed?

Would a doctor recommend heart bypass surgery without having examined the heart?

Should a child decide whether to go to school? To medical appointments?

Would you say that deciding whether to have a relationship with a parent is as at least a significant decision as attending school or medical appointments?

Then why should they decide on whether to visit a parent or to have a relationship with a parent?

What specific examples did the child cite to justify the adverse opinions about and refusal to have a relationship with the targeted/alienated parent? (Generally these (experts) do not follow-up with questions for specific information. If they do, they an answer like “She/he lies. She/he is annoying, etc.” The expert should be questioned about her/his willingness to accept such frivolous rationalizations.)

How reliable is client self reporting? (It is not at all, and we accept that as truth in the mental health profession.)

Would it not be logical to conclude that the immature emotional and cognitive development of a child would make their reporting even less reliable?

Do you know any research on the effects on children if a parent is not meaningfully involved in their lives?

When a parent is significantly minimized and excluded from a child’s life, what do you think children fill that emotional vacuum with?

(Educate the “expert” about such research by using the statistics from Fatherneed and the SPARC statistics. A summary is in the PAS help file which I previously sent to anyone who had requested it.)

Would you not then conclude that having a parent eradicated from a child’s life leads to emotional distress and behavioral difficulties for the child?

And if such eradication was facilitated, either consciously or unconsciously, by the other parent, would you not consider that to be emotional child abuse?

Are you aware of any tactics the alienating parent/residential parent employed to interfere with the visits and/or relationship with the child and the targeted parent? (This is a case specific question and should be supported by documentation from the particular case by citing examples of the alienating behaviors.)

You made reference to the alienator’s many allegations against the other parent. Do you have no independent verification of those allegations? You really don’t, do you?

Why would you accept such allegations carte blanche without independent verification?

In your professional opinion, what would be the justification or motivations of the residential parent for not encouraging the relationship between the child and the other parent?

Do you believe that children are generally healthier if 2 parents remained meaningfully in their lives?You have recommended that contact between the child and the nonresidential parent the only gradually reinstated?

What is the research that supports this gradual reunification? (There is none! The propensity for the judicial system to only gradually reinstate visits is not supported by any research whatsoever.)

How do you explain that children of military families and who never met their deployed parent, excitedly run to, hug, smile at their deployed parent when that parent returns home from deployment?

Is it not true that it is because the caretaking parent talks up the deployed parent and enthusiastically encourages the child to greet the deployed parent explains it?

Is it not also true that the psychological and instinctual need and desire to have a relationship with a parent is so overwhelmingly strong that children will easily accept meaningful involvement from a parent from whom they have been estranged?  I have no more questions of this witness.

The movement to help fathers with their rights to parenting their children is called the Father’s Rights Movement.

https://www.tumblr.com/childrensrights/151538061347/childrens-rights-facebook-group

Shared Parenting Reduces Childhood Stress

The researchers predicted that, after the children whose parents weren’t divorced, the children who lived with one parent would exhibit the fewest issues.

However, these children were actually significantly more likely to experience various health problems, including:

• Disturbed sleep

• Feelings of tension or sadness

• Dizziness

  Headaches

• Issues concentrating

• Stomachaches or appetite disturbances

The researchers theorized that children who spent time living with both parents after divorce might experience fewer health issues for various reasons. These children might enjoy closer relationships with each parent.

They might also have greater access to financial and social resources, which could offer various benefits for their general well-being. These benefits may make shared parenting an approach worth seriously considering for parents who are already interested in this arrangement.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Related articles

• COURT ENABLED PARENTAL ALIENATION IS CHILD ABUSE ~~ NO CONTACT SINCE JANUARY 24th, 2015 ~~ #StandupforZoraya
• Criminalize Parental Alienation ~ 3 STRIKES FELONY
• Does a Child’s Best Interest Constitute a Material Change of Circumstances?: Canada v. Canada
• When Parents Turn Poisonous
• Jail time for parental alienation not in best interests of children
• By Banning Books Do We Challenge Parental Rights?
• The rights that children have to free and equal association with both fit parents that should not be invaded by the State or infringed upon by another parent
• A Hayekian Theory of Parental Rights
• American Voices: Partners Who Share Parenting Duties Have Better Sex
• Judges Violate the Code of Judicial Conduct

THE MOLLER LAW GROUP, LLC

Many parents who are divorcing in Colorado appreciate the potential benefits of shared parenting. Still, they may worry that this arrangement will create needless stress for their children. Shared parenting can introduce relocations and upheaval. It also can increase parental interactions, along with the potential for conflict. However, recent research suggests that, despite these issues, shared parenting after divorce might still be the least stressful arrangement for children.

View original post 548 more words

Pope urges better treatment for divorced Catholics

http://iloveandneedmydaughter.blogspot.com/2011/10/who-is-she.html

http://iloveandneedmydaughter.blogspot.com/2011/10/who-is-she.html

“Having children is looked upon as an inconvenience, but rather children bring so much into family life and so much enrichment that it outbalances the economics of it,” Bishop Rozanski said.

Bishop Rozanski said we can expect to hear more of the pope’s message in September, when he’ll travel to Philadelphia for the World Meeting of Families conference.

Family and religion have historically been the two most important social institutions, but in the past few decades, as people struggle with the cost of living and wait longer to get married, the economy has become a bigger factor in the way families look.
Dr. Laura Hansen teaches a sociology and family class at Western New England University. She said recessions in the U.S. and Europe make people pessimistic about their finances and the future.

Related articles

• Pope expresses concern for families to Congress
• Why Every Family Needs a Father and Every Father Needs a Family
• The marriage/divorce/remarriage carousel…
• Pope Reforms Catholic Annulment Process: Vatican
• A Message From Heaven For A Daughter
• Parenting an Alienated Child
• A Father’s Love Is No Less Than A Mother’s
• The Crisis of Fatherhood | Psychology Today
• Child custody and visitation; the relationship continues
• Inequality Ignored, Does it matter?

What Happens When Family Courts Prioritize Parental Rights Over The Rights Of The Child?

These cases highlight how justice systems fail families and children. From failures to see beyond facades, and a complete lack of understanding when it comes to children, as well as awful set backs to achieving just and fair hearings due to costs and imposed penalties thanks to an adversarial system, such stories are poignant examples of the pain poor child welfare practices and procedure inflict on vulnerable parties.

You can read the daughter’s statement here:

“I am 19 years of age born July 12th 1995.

At the age of four I was removed from the care of my mother by a Family Court Order. Her relationship with my father was brief. She broke a court order to protect me when she learned that my father had HIV/AIDS. He had not disclosed this to her and obviously didn’t use safe sex given that I was born. Furthermore, he had two convictions for child sexual abuse and others for violence. My mother was also aware that he had been accused of sexually abusing another close relative who was too afraid of him to make a statement to police. The charges involved his adopted daughter who had a restraining order on him. Because my mother left him, he applied for custody of me simply to punish her. This made my mother determined to protect me by moving interstate.

We were traced and I was physically removed from my mother by police to emergency foster care in WA and I can still remember the fear of being taken by strangers to live with strangers. Thereafter, Family Court Justice Murray knowingly ordered me to live with a single man who had no history of single parenting and had a history of sex offending, a man who would not be allowed to work or volunteer with other people’s children as he would be on the paedophile register. She discounted his criminal convictions saying that they occurred a while ago.

I was court ordered to attend the Child Adolescent and Family Health Service when I was about 5 years of age. I was unable to talk in confidence because my father was always present. The same thing happened when I was aged about ten and my parents were in the same room.  I am still having psychiatric treatment for depression and anxiety as well as Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. I am currently on 150mg doses of anti-depressants each day as well as requiring regular counselling sessions.

For nine years, I was restricted to occasional supervised contact with my mother and the time allowed amounted to a mere nine days a year.  I had no opportunity to have any private conversation with her, not even when I was approaching puberty. I was also banned from travelling interstate until I was eighteen. For a very long time I blamed my mother for my predicament: I rationalised that if she hadn’t fled to Perth, I would not have been deprived of maternal care.

I lost my childhood as the sole carer of my father who was chronically ill as a result of HIV/AIDS from before the time that I was born.  He was diagnosed with emphysema, he was hospitalized with pneumonia every winter, he had no spleen and eventually could not walk. When he died in June 2010, he was suffering from bone marrow cancer. I had to do all the shopping, household chores and gardening because he did not have the breath to engage in any physical activity.  I had no assistance whatsoever from any of the services that should and could have helped.  In ten years, on only one occasion did a social services person come to assess risk. The department was supposed to visit me to assess whether I was “at risk” of abuse or neglect and that never happened. A social worker was supposed to visit me every three months to check on health and hygiene but that never happened. It was not until I ran away from home at the age of thirteen and went to live with my sister that I knew how

to have a shower properly. I had to take sheets to my mother to launder because my father refused to let me use the laundry. Until I was about ten or eleven, my sheets had never been laundered.  I used to get complaints from the school that I was dirty, malodorous and was infested with head lice and this related to the fact that I was never washed. Dad rarely bought clothes for me and my shoes were invariably too small. I walked around shoeless as a consequence.

I never had breakfast and rarely had money for lunch at school. There may have been bread in the house but nothing else.  I never saw anyone visit dad from health services but I did accompany him to the hospital for blood tests.  He hated needles and they took a very large number of vials. On one occasion, they could not withdraw any more blood.

I learned later that there had been many reports.. around 46, of child abuse and neglect made to Families SA by child care workers, Murray Bridge Police,  teachers, family friends and contact supervisors as well as by my mother and Professor Freda Briggs AO. All of the reports were dismissed as having been instigated by my mother and they were never investigated.

When I was seven, my father took me to the Child Protection Unit at Flinders Medical Centre. I was told to lie on the bed and remove my pants and I was then examined vaginally by a male doctor for sexual penetration.  I was not asked any questions about this.  I wasn’t even told why I was there..  At that time I was being sexually abused but not penetrated by my older half brother Aaron who was then sixteen years old.  I was asked no questions. The doctor then told me to leave the room and he then talked to my father alone.  My father defended my brother and denied that I was being abused although on one occasion he caught him “red-handed”.

The sexual abuse continued for roughly six years from the age of five until my half-brother was jailed for the attempted murder of his drug dealer with whom he lived. When paroled, he was ordered to live in the same house as me and that is when I ran away because I was terrified that the abuse would start again.

My half brother sexually abused me at home and at his mother’s house. He was also involved in having me used for sex by his friend who was about the same age. This took place at the friend’s mother’s house at Elizabeth, South Australia.

My father used to take photos of me when I was naked and he showed them to his friends. This only stopped when I was aged 9-10 years.  He then got his girlfriend to do it.  She began to realise that he was a paedophile and left the relationship.

When I was thirteen I ran away from my father’s house because I was terrified of my brother who had been paroled to our house.  I tried to phone Families SA at the regional office at Noarlunga but failed to get through to them. I went to stay with a friend of my mother but she couldn’t accommodate me and she phoned Professor Briggs for advice. She contacted the deputy CEO of Families SA who instructed her to tell Justice Burr that I had attempted suicide and had run away from home and was homeless because I was afraid of my half brother whose gun had not been found.  I went to live with my sister in the Adelaide Hills and she took me to police to show that I was not a missing person. As we were leaving, the police officer asked, “Is there anything else you want to tell me?”. I then had the confidence to disclose the sexual abuse by my then adult half-brother Aaron.  I was believed by the Family Court social worker Dr. Merrylyn Asquith, police and the child protection officer

from Families SA.  Family Court Justice Burr ignored them and claimed that my mother had trained me to lie and he ordered me to see my father for Father’s Day.  I collapsed and was hospitalised at the Adelaide Women’s and Children’s Hospital  several times suffering from anxiety disorder, depression and suicidal ideation. Justice Burr dismissed me as a “drama queen”. My father broke into my locked  diary and used it against me in court quoting me as saying that my self-harm was intentional and not emotionally driven by the trauma I had experienced. The judge accused my mother of training me to make false allegations when I had not had any contact with her for months.

Police did not prosecute my half brother because he and my father denied the offences and it was my word against theirs. None of the people who had seen evidence of abuse or suspected abuse were interviewed. I have always been puzzled why someone would believe a convicted paedophile rather than a victim.

I eventually returned to live with my mother when I was thirteen. My father refused to give me my clothes and property. When I went to collect them, he refused to give me access. I pushed past him and I was later arrested for trespass by police who were called by my half sister. I was only able to remove two teddy bears.

An Independent Children’s Lawyer was appointed (Mr. Hemsley) to act on my behalf when I was quite young. He only met me once in nine years and on that occasion he did not ask where or with whom I wanted to live. He asked no relevant questions but advised the judge and others that I should not be allowed to live with my sister because she was a successful business-woman..

I understand that the then CEO of Families SA, Sue Vardon AO said that child protection services are unable to intervene if a Family Court Order is in place. This seems to be a widespread perception among politicians as well as CEOs and I am advised that it is wrong.

I suggest the following:

that Families SA should have realised that I was at risk of harm when some 46 reports of child abuse and neglect had been made to the Child Abuse Report Line, including a report of physical abuse by Murray Bridge Police and a report of physical neglect by Professor Freda Briggs AO who met me when accompanied by forensic psychologist Dr. Marie O’Neill AM. None of these reports were investigated. The Commissioner of Police confirmed that he was powerless to intervene as Families SA has sole responsibility for family related abuse.

That Families SA should have recognised that I was at risk of harm when I was the sole carer of a father suffering from HIV/AIDS and numerous related illnesses.

That Families SA should have recognised that I was at serious risk of harm when I was the carer of a father who had two convictions for child rape and convictions for violence that, knowing the above, Families SA should have checked on my well-being over the years.. and didn’t.

Families SA knew that my school attendance was poor because I was caring for my sick father.. and did nothing.

That Families SA should have provided assistance to protect me from HIV/AIDS given that I was sole carer of my father. There was none.  I was  having to deal with my father’s sores and there are no surgical gloves available for little children.

I should not have had to go to Flinders Medical Centre CPU for assessment for child sex abuse accompanied by my father. I was never questioned.

Families SA lied to complainants and said that I had been accompanied by a social worker, not my father. He had caught my brother sexually abusing me but my father protected him on every occasion. When I asked him why he did this, he said, “I’ve already lost you (I’d run away) and I don’t want to lose my son”. Throughout the 5 years of abuse, the perpetrator used threats on my life if I “told” (except when he was in jail for shooting his drug dealer). He also bribed me to cooperate and remain silent

I should not have been examined genitally by a male doctor at the Child Protection Unit. I should have been given a choice of male v female.

There should have been contact between health and child protection services. There was none.

Child abuse should have been investigated regardless of Family Court Orders and regardless of the assumption that all those reports to the Child Abuse Report Line had been initiated by my mother (when they had not). The CEO of Families SA, Sue Vardon AO told Professor Briggs that they could not intervene “unless it’s a matter of life and death” if a Family Court Order was in place. I understand that this belief persists and is erroneous.

I was denied the opportunity to talk to anyone about my life and safety. I felt alienated  because decisions about my life and safety were being made by strangers. My father openly told everyone, except the judge, that he did not want to have to look after me ….he only wanted to get at my mother and the reason for that was that she put posters around his neighbourhood warning parents that he was a paedophile. The poster had a photograph of him and details of his convictions and HIV status. She did this because he had not told her that he was infected at the time of sexual intercourse and she was disgusted that he had put my life and hers at risk.

It is clear to me that, in ignoring my plight, Families SA  disregarded its own child protection protocols and guidelines and in so doing, exposed me to the significant risk of physical, emotional and sexual abuse and HIV/AIDS which has resulted in failure to complete my education to year 12 and mental illness.

The department’s documentation states that, “Children and young people have a right to be safe and protected at all times, including when accessing services in the community. The Children’s Protection Act 1993 requires all organisations providing health, education, welfare, sporting or recreational, religious or spiritual, child care, or residential services wholly or partly for children to develop policies and procedures to create and maintain a safe environment for children and young people. In this context, a child safe environment is an environment which is both child-safe and child-friendly, where children feel respected, valued and encouraged to reach their full potential”.

It does not say that children should not be protected if there is a Family Court Order in place.”

Many thanks to the National Child Protection Alliance for sharing these case studies with us.

“Changing a child last name (away from the father’s) is an act of venom”

 

STOP Court’s DENIAL of REASONABLE Parent/Child CONTACT Stop Court Ordered Parental Alienation and Judicial Misconduct

“Justice is a part of the human makeup. And if you deprive a person of Justice on a continuous basis, it’s really an attack (and not to get religious or anything) but it’s an attack on the human soul. We have, as societies, evolved ideas of Justice and we have done that because human nature needs Justice and it needs resolution. And if you deprive somebody of that long enough they’re going to have reactions…”

Parents That Lie About Being Victims of Parental Alienation
By Joseph Goldberg – http://www.ParentalAlienationEducation.com
.
I have done a lot of work to help parents and professionals
with problems related to parental alienation.
I have organized and hosted numerous conferences on the
topic of parental alienation. One conference even made the
front page of the National Post newspaper, March 29, 2009
.
http://www.cspas.ca
.
I have authored a continuing educational course on treat –
ment for parental alienation. My online CE course provides
18 CEU’s and is approved by the American Psychological
Association and dozens of other professional associations.
.
http://www.parentalalienationeducation.com/ceus/
.
I’ve reformed state mandated divorce education programs
to include curriculum content, on the dynamics of parental
alienation.
.
http://www.onlineparentingprograms.com
.
I’ve written articles on parental alienation and children that
exhibit visitation refusal behaviour.
.
http://www.mediate.com/pdf/parentalalienation.pdf
.
I developed a website that offers the most advanced online
education in parental alienation for legal and mental health
professionals.
.
http://www.ParentalAlienationEducation.com
.
I have the only established consulting practice in the USA
that provides litigation support to lawyers on psycho-legal
issues pertaining to parental alienation.
.
http://www.ParentalAlienaton.ca
.
I am a member of the Parental Alienation Study Group
which makes me a recognized expert in parental alienation.
.
http://www.pasg.info
.
I’m leading with this information about my expertise for
a good reason. I want you to know that I do have bona
fide credentials in parental alienation, and because my
reputation is meaningful to me, I want you to know that
I would not risk compromising my reputation by making
provocative, or false statements about people lying.
I want you to know that my statement is supported by a
voluminous amount of research and facts.
.
My research in social media led me to conclude a
large population of parents lie about being victims of
parental alienation. In an experiment I offered several
opportunities to thousands of parents ( claiming to be
victims of parental alienation ) a chance to take full ad-
vantage of free consultations and free video conferen-
ces, on the subject of parental alienation. The tracked
response confirmed only 5% of the members of these
social media groups accepted the free offers.
.
The social media groups included more than twenty
groups claiming to be support groups or advocates for
recognition of parental alienation; in addition other
groups correlated to high conflict divorce with children
were pooled into the social media population including:
Father Rights Organizations, StepParenting groups,
Blended Family Support Groups, Support Groups for
Personality Disordered Relationship Survivors and the
population included non-custodial parent groups.
.
This low response rate helps to validate that many of
the parents joining these social media sites -claiming
to be victims of an alienating parent or – claiming that
their children are victims of parental alienation – have
not been truthful, in addition, the high statistical result
for non-reactive parents ( 95% ) supports the finding
that these non-reactive parents, do not match up with
the profile of a targeted parent.
.
A targeted parent with an alienated child would not
turn down a free consultation to receive support for
themselves and for their children. Nor would a true
targeted parent refuse to accept an offer to receive
access to free online video conferences specifically
about the subject of parental alienation. Nor would
targeted parents turn down offers to help them with
opportunities to repair a lost / damaged relationship
with their child(ren).
The statistical data validates that parents are lying
about being victims of parental alienation and they
are lying about having children- who are victims of
alienation.
.
Over the last 2 years, I also provided over 150 Free
consultations. During the course of those consults I
ruled out parental alienation as a dynamic in approx-
imately 50% of those consultations.
.
This additional data is an important statistical finding
that supports the fact a significantly large population
of parents claiming to be victims of PA regardless of
whether or not they discovered an offer for free serv-
ices through social media groups or through other re-
sources lends further credibility to findings that many
parents are just not truthful about being victims.
.
This research has a far greater value for treatment of
children that have ruptured relationships with parents.
The right therapeutic approach is critical to repairing
these parent-child relational problems and it is crucial
that a mental health professional with the right expert-
ise is assisting or the outcome will only lead to longer
periods of disconnection if not outright failure.
.
The next logical question to ask is why are so many
people lying about being false victims of alienation ?
I have a hypothesis that there are several reasons why
parents are not truthful about being victims of parental
alienation.
.
Some of those reasons include:
1. Many parents cannot look at any of their own
contributions to the estrangement because some
parents live in denial or a delusional state as a
way to protect them from feelings of wrongdoing.
2. Some parents seek validation from outsiders as
a way to explain away their lost or ruptured relation-
ships to extended family members, significant
others, new spouses and friends.
3. More than a few parents are making false claims
to cover up real abuse and continue to try and claw
back a parent-child relationship through the courts.
4. There is a lot of chatter and information on social
media sites about parental alienation and it feeds
a growing population of parents losing custody in
court cases, CPS investigations and post divorce
litigation.
My guess is that one day we may discover dozens of
explanations for why parents lie about being victims
of parental alienation. We are only at the starting gate
for understanding the causal factors, but one thing is
certain – If you are a parent that wants to know if you
can solve a problem pertaining to parental alienation,
you should stop listening to parents making any such
claims in social media groups. You are far more likely
to follow bad advice and listen to frauds, liars and an
abundant number of delusional parents, looking for a
sympathetic shoulder to cry on.
.
Real victims of parental alienation need to only make
an effort to contact a consultant to get answers to the
questions they have about this subject.
Parents wrongly accused of parental alienation, also
need to understand they should not listen to non-experts
in social media groups. Any wrongly accused parent
should contact only an expert and consultant in parental
alienation to learn how to address false allegations.

• 

  

  OpREFORMCPS Social Services Worldwide, Scott Adams, Child Protection Reform Worldwide, Omar Inguanzo and 14 others like this.

  

  

  Children’s Rights Facebook.com/StandupforZoraya   · Like ·

  

  http://www.causes.com/causes/409526-children-s-rights-and-family-law-reform

  

   

  

  http://www.causes.com/causes/409526-children-s-rights-and-family-law-reform

  

  http://www.causes.com/causes/409526-children-s-rights-and-family-law-reform

  Petition To Chief Judge Bertila Soto… — Family Justice & Child Protection Worldwide Reform Committee  —  STOP Court’s DENIAL of REASONABLE Parent/Child 
  
  CONTACT – CAUSES.COM  — at Lawson E. Thomas Courthouse.

  

  

 

Related articles

• Judges Violate the Code of Judicial Conduct
• Call made for modern family legislation
• Want To Find Out How The Family Court Works? Now You Can.
• What Principles Guide Our Country?
• Introducing The Foundation for the Child Victims of the Family Courts Radio Show
• A Powerful Letter to Family Court Judges
• Family Judge Deprived Man of Fair Hearing – This happens everyday in America!!
• The American Fathers: Swept Away by Henry Sullivan
• U.s. Legal System Abuse – Rise and Overcome
• Divorced Co-Parenting Oxymoron

Researching Reform

At Researching Reform, we would say significant damage to a child’s healthy development at best, and at worst, the loss of that child’s life.

Important case studies presented at a 2003 conference held bythe Australian Institute of Criminologyhighlight the very real problems inside family courts which use similar models to our own.

In the first case study, a mother tells the story of how she abducted her young daughter to protect her from a then absent father who had been convicted of child sexual abuse. He returned out of spite to obtain custody of their daughter, and the daughter has since complained of being routinely abused by her father. But no one is listening.

The second case study, which is added below, is written by the daughter and tells the story of her family history, from her perspective.

These cases highlight how justice systems fail families and children…

View original post 2,486 more words

What it means to be a Champion for Children and Parents

A national, nonpartisan, nonprofit citizens‘ organization documenting how judges break the law and get away with it.

http://www.causes.com/causes/409526-children-s-rights-and-family-law-reform

Judicial Engineering is a phrase that should become as familiar to Americans as judicial activism, judicial independence, judicial misconduct, and judicial accountability. Learn More at https://jedi1.wikispaces.com/INTRODUCTION

Our Mission . . .
To improve the quality of our judiciary by removing political considerations from the judicial selection process and by ensuring that the process of disciplining and removing judges is effective and meaningful.

What We Do . . .

• Educate the public about the paramount importance of the judiciary and its role in protecting our constitutional form of government.
• Document the nature and extent of judicial incompetence, abuse, and dishonesty and the failure of judicial conduct commissions and screening panels to protect the public.
• Network judicial activists and legal reform groups around the country to promote citizen involvement, concerted action, and protection for judicial “whistleblowers”.
  Track media coverage of issues of judicial selection and discipline, working with reporters and editors to provide accurate coverage.
• Testify before public and private bodies involved in judicial issues.
• Initiate and support legal action in the public interest to advance the goal of a quality judiciary, free from political influence.

A FORUM FOR IDEAS TO REFORM

CALL TO ACTION

Re: Ex-Judge, Henry Ferro, 352-369-8889, takes on corrupt judges and sheriff in Federal court.

Hi Everyone, 
If you want to be represented by an honest attorney to fight the present corruption, call Ex-Judge, Henry Ferro, 352-369-8889. Mr. Ferro is representing a doctor friend of mine, Todd Overcash. Please, see attached Federal lawsuit,

Share this recent article with all your contacts:

Doctor sues sheriff, 9 judges and others alleging conspiracy in custody case

Ten years into a lengthy and acrimonious split, a local surgeon has filed a lawsuit against his former wife. He also is suing nine judges, the sheriff, three deputies, four representatives from…OCALA.COM

Let’s go on the offensive against these crooks. If the gay and lesbian community won “marriage” rights, we can surely win our parental’s right back.

http://www.causes.com/causes/409526-children-s-rights-and-family-law-reform

Join our Parents’ right class action lawsuit:.

Dr. Mario Jimenez
http://www.VoteMario.Us
http://www.VoteFamily.Us

Federal Lawsuit – Say No To Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS)

Federal Lawsuit
SAYNOTOPAS.COM

Judge Orders Man to Pay 30K in Child Support for a Kid That Isn’t His — Detroit Man Turns Himself in After Not Paying Child Support for A Kid That Isn’t His — Michigan to Jail Carnell Alexander for Child Support for A Kid That Isn’t His — Judge Orders Detroit Man to Pay 30,000 in Back Child Support for A Child That Isn’t His 

http://www.causes.com/causes/409526-children-s-rights-and-family-law-reform

http://www.causes.com/causes/409526-children-s-rights-and-family-law-reform

STOP BY THE NEW FAMILY LAW REFORM WIKI 

FAMILYPEDIA

Become a member and add content or simply browse the Familypedia pages. This is a great place to share your personal experience or valuable information you have learned about family court.

— Grandparents4Justice Worldwide  Stop Emotional Child Abuse, Parental Alienation & other Child abuse awareness/prevention, Daveyone Familylawman World4Justice Campaign, Canada Family Law Reform Write One Letter Campaign, Children’s Rights, Child Protection Reform Worldwide,Boycottfamilylaw : Restore Children’s Rights Worldwide,Family Justice & Child Protection Worldwide Reform Committee Stop Emotional Child Abuse and Children’s Rights

U.S. FAMILY LAWS.

Parenting Coordinator/Parenting Facilitator ~ TOOL OF THE DAY: Parenting Coordinator/Parenting Facilitator CATEGORY: Family Law All states are using “the best interest of the child” to justify any action…

FIXFAMILYCOURTS.COM

Does joint custody affect child support in Florida?  ~ Yes. Child Support is calculations use several factors, which include the combined income of both parties (minus tax deductions), the number of children the parties have together, child care and…

Miami Family Court Judge Re-Abuse Child Worse Than Abusers – Stop Abuse Campaign. ~ Network judicial activists and legal reform groups around the country to promote citizen involvement, concerted action, and protection for judicial “whistleblowers”.

Court Filing | National Liberty Alliance ~ It is “TIME” to hold all judges accountable we are “NOW” venturing into a massive campaign to expose the out of control judicial corruption (RICO) across America. We will be serving “every” federal judge and filing in all 94 Federal District Courts across America simultaneously. NOW IS THE TIME to pay attention and become active. YOUR PARTICIPATION IS NEEDED, it’s your duty! …”The words ‘district court of the United States’ commonlydescribe constitutional courts created under Article III of the Constitution, not the legislative courts which have long been the courts of the Territories.” [Mookini v. U.S., 303 U.S. 201, 205, 58 S.Ct. 543, 545, 82 L.Ed. 748. (See also Longshoremen v. Juneau Spruce Corp., 324 U.S. 237; Reynolds v. U.S., 98 U.S. 145, 154; McAlister v. U.S., 141 U.S. 174; U.S. v. Burroughs, 289 U.S. 159, 163] 28 U.S. Code § 132 – Creation and composition of district courts (a) There shall be in each judicial district a district court which shall be a court of record…Read More 

Judges merely redirect the dysfunction of one parent as a means to achieve an equitable settlement without regard for children. Prospective lawyers to become judges practice under a code of ethics where they are only allowed to have regard their clients and not the children. A prospect practices under these rules of engagement for 20-30m years before a simple letter of appointment to the bench. They can in no way be expected to have regard for children after this indoctrination. The code of ethics for those lawyers practicing family law needs to change before anything gets better for children. Just know the enemy of your children are the lawyers and judges themselves. https://youtu.be/gYwrJHxfWgQ?list=PLED6CE6FEA630E99E

Judges merely redirect the dysfunction of one parent as a means to achieve an equitable settlement without regard for children. Prospective lawyers to become judges practice under a code of ethics where they are only allowed to have regard their clients and not the children. A prospect practices under these rules of engagement for 20-30m years before a simple letter of appointment to the bench. They can in no way be expected to have regard for children after this indoctrination. The code of ethics for those lawyers practicing family law needs to change before anything gets better for children. Just know the enemy of your children are the lawyers and judges themselves. https://youtu.be/gYwrJHxfWgQ?list=PLED6CE6FEA630E99E

Judges merely redirect the dysfunction of one parent as a means to achieve an equitable settlement without regard for children. Prospective lawyers to become judges practice under a code of ethics where they are only allowed to have regard their clients and not the children. A prospect practices under these rules of engagement for 20-30m years before a simple letter of appointment to the bench. They can in no way be expected to have regard for children after this indoctrination. The code of ethics for those lawyers practicing family law needs to change before anything gets better for children. Just know the enemy of your children are the lawyers and judges themselves. https://youtu.be/gYwrJHxfWgQ?list=PLED6CE6FEA630E99E

Judges merely redirect the dysfunction of one parent as a means to achieve an equitable settlement without regard for children. Prospective lawyers to become judges practice under a code of ethics where they are only allowed to have regard their clients and not the children. A prospect practices under these rules of engagement for 20-30m years before a simple letter of appointment to the bench. They can in no way be expected to have regard for children after this indoctrination. The code of ethics for those lawyers practicing family law needs to change before anything gets better for children. Just know the enemy of your children are the lawyers and judges themselves. https://youtu.be/gYwrJHxfWgQ?list=PLED6CE6FEA630E99E

Facebook.com/StandupforZoraya

Judges merely redirect the dysfunction of one parent as a means to achieve an equitable settlement without regard for children. Prospective lawyers to become judges practice under a code of ethics where they are only allowed to have regard their clients and not the children. A prospect practices under these rules of engagement for 20-30m years before a simple letter of appointment to the bench. They can in no way be expected to have regard for children after this indoctrination. The code of ethics for those lawyers practicing family law needs to change before anything gets better for children. Just know the enemy of your children are the lawyers and judges themselves. https://youtu.be/gYwrJHxfWgQ?list=PLED6CE6FEA630E99E

Facebook.com/StandupforZoraya

Judges merely redirect the dysfunction of one parent as a means to achieve an equitable settlement without regard for children. Prospective lawyers to become judges practice under a code of ethics where they are only allowed to have regard their clients and not the children. A prospect practices under these rules of engagement for 20-30m years before a simple letter of appointment to the bench. They can in no way be expected to have regard for children after this indoctrination. The code of ethics for those lawyers practicing family law needs to change before anything gets better for children. Just know the enemy of your children are the lawyers and judges themselves. https://youtu.be/gYwrJHxfWgQ?list=PLED6CE6FEA630E99E

http://www.causes.com/causes/409526-children-s-rights-and-family-law-reform

Facebook.com/StandupforZoraya

A man who won’t die for something is not fit to live.

WE PETITION THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO:

Look into laws regarding child custody in respect to fathers rights, violations of court orders, and police enforcement.

1. Make denials of court ordered visitations a civil infration at the time of denial as to imposes financial burden on those that choose willingly to go against court orders. With the still enacted contempt charge to follow.

Punishment should be in the form of fines for the first 3 offenses such as first offense $250, 2nd offense $500, 3rd offense $1,000. Any subsequent offenses would be viewed as a misdemeanor with jail time no less then 7 days but not more then 90 days, or $1500 fines or both.

2. License suspension for those that are not willing to pay their court ordered civil infractions either in full or by payment arrangements.

Facebook.com/StandupforZoraya

Fox 54 Investigates: Courts and custody battles ~ WFXG FOX54 reporter Nick Lulli is digging deeper into the family court system of the Augusta judicial cirtcuit.

WFXG.COM|BY WFXG FOX 54

• 
  Fighting Fathers of The First Judicial Circuit ~ Fighting Fathers has long pondered the problem of…  FIGHTINGFATHERSOFDISTRICT1.COM 
•  Let’s Join The Purple Keyboard Campaign((Activate :2015))4 Family Justice Reform! for Dads Who Want To See Their Kids But Their Hating Mothers’ Won’t Let Them

  

  Children’s Rights and Family Law Reform

  ‎Children’s Rights Facebook Public Group ·  Via SAVE for Falsely Accused:

  

  

“If someone is falsely accused of a crime, pleads not guilty, & the charges are dismissed, he/she may be able to file suit against the person who brought the charges. E.g., if a private citizen files a false criminal charge against another person or falsely makes a complaint to a police officer that results in another’s arrest, and if no conviction results, the accused may sue the accuser for malicious prosecution.”

“Changing a child last name (away from the father’s) is an act of venom”

 

· NetworkedBlogs · The public participated, mostly asking questions about how and why they got screwed in their particular family court case, which of course the judges couldn’t answer.

ParentalRights.org

· NetworkedBlogs ·

Should I worry about my teenage child testifying in court in my custody case?

Related articles

• So few in the Media will Expose the Judicial Corruption of Judges
• Petition – Removal of confidentiality of all complaints of judicial misconduct regardless of probable cause findings in Florida. – Change.org
• U.s. Legal System Abuse – Rise and Overcome
• Power Over Poverty Under Laws of America Restored
• Uniting Against Court Corruption
• 50+ State Lawmakers Support Child Custody Law Reform
• Abc’s 20/20 Friday April 8th – Tonight Exposing Corrupt Family Court Judges
• Exposed Corrupt Family Court Judge ~ ABC 20/20
• Unlawfully Victimized by American “Family Court” System.
• What Does It Actually Mean To Be A Champion For Parents And Children?

The Love and Iron Project

Well, here’s what we think it means:

• It means standing up for what’s right by speaking with deeds; not lip service.
• It means leading by example.
• It means being a role model for your kids and those around you.
• It means standing up for those who are too weak or too afraid to stand-up for themselves.

The Truth Is…

Most of your friends, colleagues, and maybe even your family probably won’t help you out with Family Law reform.

Because let’s be fair.

Some have their own problems to worry about, and our cause simply isn’t relevant to them so it’s not on their radar as important.

Others, (probably more than you think) are against equal parenting because they have a lot to lose if reforms are effected.

So they’re not going to help you, even if they won’t admit this and be honest with you about it.

And some folks may empathize with you and really want reforms; but they’re too afraid to take public stand for fear…

View original post 211 more words

Stop Family Court Kidnapping

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Every debate from now on should promise to ask a real question about Family Law Reform; 50/50 Parenting Plans!!!

– Justice is a concept of moral rightness based on ethics, rationality, law,natural law, religion, equity or fairness, as well as the administration of the law, taking into account the inalienable and inborn rights of all human beings and citizens…

Parental alienation is real. It’s been real for a long time. It may take time for the mental health community to go through the red tape of getting the words right so they cover their own butts and figure out how they mutually agree on treatment so they will be paid for it, but it’s there nonetheless. Parental Alienation like many other things in this world is caught up in the red tape of humanity while good parents and children suffer and families are destroyed.

“It’s Constitutional! Discussing Constitution and Family Law Reform.” — See~~>http://sco.lt/6t4kJF

If you’re concerned about Crime and Delinquency then you should be concerned with the Reform of the Family Courts in America. Here’s why ~ According to the Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, “The most reliable indicator of violent crime in a community is the proportion of fatherless families. Fatherless families, in turn, are caused in part by family courts that exclude fathers from post-divorce parenting. By instituting shared parenting after divorce or separation, fathers would be allowed to continue to show their sons the right way to grow into manhood.” ~AND~ In the release, Dr. Ned Holstein, founder and board chair of National Parents Organization said: “Unfortunately, however, our nation’s family courts prevent millions of divorced and separated fathers from having meaningful relationships with their children, which only leave their children more vulnerable to this unfortunate behavior.”

That’s why EVERY Presidential Debate MUST discuss the Family Courts in America and how to fix it.

~ iloveandneedmydaughter.blogspot.com

PERSONAL CAMPAIGN

Jose is gathering 875 signatures to Stop Court’s Denial Of Reasonable Parent/Child Contact

Dear Honorable Jack Reed- Family-Friends, Family Court Reform: It matters to me because lawless america is all about exposing the fact that we now live in Lawless America. We no longer have laws that are enforced because judges do whatever they want to do. America has also become lawless because government officials are dishonest and/or corrupt. Millions of victims never realized what happen to them In court. I began to research and the more I began to look at the statutes in what was going on in our judicial branch, I began to see that there were some real problems that we have in our branch of government and the judiciary.Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness were promised to each of us by our founding fathers. And the resulting legal system was intended to protect us and sustain us with reason, fairness and order. But the present state of family law makes this harder and harder to achieve – particularly in regards to fathers rights and visitation rights,Arbitrary laws and a confrontational legal system have created a litigious nightmare for many of us. I m motivated to joining the cause defending our fatherhood In a broken Family Law System. American fathers are led down a primes path everyday In our family courts, often with disastrous legal results. Fathers wind up In the land of Gender Bias, where we are systematically stripped of our rights, often without the slightest Idea of why It Is happening to us. Courts are supposed to approach cases of child custody , support payments, visitation rights In what we call a gender-neutral posture. It sounds fair, and It Is fair. Judges are not enforcing these gender laws fairly, and few seem to care. We have and will continue more of these problems until proud fathers like me organize and speak up to demand fair treatment . We have a legitimate legal Issue and we need to make It public our concerns a public Issue. We need the courts to hear us.

Invite

PERSONAL CAMPAIGN

Cherish is gathering 500 signatures to Stop Court’s Denial Of Reasonable Parent/Child Contact

I have 3 boys one being a single father who is 19. I didn’t know how horrible the “system” is against fathers. My son signed the voluntary paternity acknowledgement as soon as the “courts” allowed him to do so. He has been involved in EVERY aspect of his child life from the moment he found out he was going to be a father at the age of 15. He finished High School and graduated at age 16, started college at age 17. For the first 3 months of his child’s life HE was the one who woke up with him in the night for the feedings, diaper changes and all the other reasons a baby wakes up in the middle of the night. He did this for HIS SON, because he loves him and because he wanted what was best for his son’s mother who was still in high school. He wanted to make sure she got the sleep she needed so she could do well in school and graduate. He did this not necessarily for her or to make her life easier but, he did this for his SON, so his son who was a child of teenagers could have both of his parents with at least a high school diploma. When he and his sons mother broke up, they agreed on a 50/50 custody and placement. For the last 18 months this is what he and the mother did. One week with one parent the next week with the other parent. CPS got involved because his son kept getting critically hurt in her care. They found enough evidence to charge her with 3 counts of neglect, and more than probable cause to charge her father (who is a 2nd degree sex offender) with sexual assault of my sons 2 1/2 year old. When my son disagreed with the “informal disposition agreement” and the “safety plan” and the “obligations” of this agreement, which it clearly states “the child and parents, guardian and legal custodian are notified of their right to object at any time to the facts or terms of this agreement. If there are objections, the intake worker may alter the terms of the agreement or recommend that a petition be filed…..” My son did disagree with the terms or “obligations” and rather than his concerns being addressed, the caseworker signed the back where he was supposed to sign “Father refuses to sign” The mother of his child has been and is working with a “parent aide” and she gave her the name of an attorney to talk to about her rights to the child. In Wisconsin and in almost EVERY state in the USA a father has NO rights when a child is born out of wed lock. The only rights he has is to sign the paternity acknowledgment and then hire an attorney and spend thousands of dollars to open a custody case so he can have LEGAL shared custody and placement. Until there is such an order an unwed mother can refuse at any point to allow her child’s father the right to see his own child or children. There are laws in place stating that it against the law to discriminate people based on race, sex, sexual orientation, so on and so forth, HOWEVER, this same law does not hold true to family law. Yes the FATHER has the right to file a petition for custody/placement, BUT the MOTHER does NOT have to do this to have custody/placement of the SAME child. This law needs to change, it needs to be equal, I believe there are MANY fathers labeled “deadbeat dads” because they end up not being able to keep affording to go to court and hire attorneys and fight for their children. We the people need to plead with our legislature’s to change this sexist and biased law. Please sign this petition for this state and every state, to make changes that are more fair not for the mothers or the fathers BUT for the innocent CHILDREN that deserve to have equal time and love from BOTH parents!!!

Invite

PERSONAL CAMPAIGN

Rolando is gathering 10 signatures to Stop Court’s Denial Of Reasonable Parent/Child Contact

I’m a victim of the 9th judicial circuit for in Osceola County, FL whom put me in a highly child support calculated with a job application job that I never get so I never couldn’t pay the $866.13 and the child support enforcement unit suspended my driver license. (License that I depend) because I’m a truck driver and one of this suspension lasted almost 3 months and I lost my job and so on.

Invite

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Related articles

• The Risks of Failing to Make Court-Ordered Child Support Payments
• Protective Parents Revolt Against Family Law Injustices
• Who Judges the Judges? Radio….. Guest: Marti Oakley
• Set Judicial Terms to Balance Accountability and Independence
• Are Some Divorcing Parents Brainwashing Their Children?
• The Alienating Parents’ Tool Of Choice
• Examining Judicial Accountability and Immunity in the Family Courts ~~ Florida”s 11th Judicial Circuit
• A Parental Alienation Syndrome Family Experience
• New Report: Custody Court Dysfunction May Claim Your Children, Health and Livelihood
• Americans for Equal Rights for Fathers

Judicial ethics and discipline

A lack of impartiality is evident when a judge takes a party’s appeal personally or over-reacts to a motion to disqualify.  For example, the Nebraska Supreme Court sanctioned behavior that disclosed a judge’s “unhealthy and wholly improper concern with the protection of her own rulings from appellate reversal.”

When a judge becomes embroiled in a controversy, the line between the judge and the controversy before the court becomes blurred, and the judge’s impartiality or appearance of impartiality may become compromised. . . .  The responsibility of a judge is to decide matters that have been submitted to the court by the parties.  The judge may not, having decided a case, advocate for or . . . materially assist one party at the expense of the other.  Such advocacy creates the appearance, and perhaps the reality, of partiality on the part of the judge.  This, in turn, erodes public confidence in…

View original post 976 more words

A Non-Adversarial Divorce

Interview: Leon Koziol – Child Custody
Children should automatically be given access to both parents every week of the year if a parent refuses the cops show up and take the kid to the other parents house if they showed up once the trying to stop visitation will end. Kids should spend 1/2 there time with each parent no parent left behind or grand parents all get to see kids and help them.
Florida laws require the parties to fill out and exchange financial affidavits, tax returns, and other documents. In non-collaborative divorces, this is usually prepared by each attorney at high hourly rates. By contrast, in collaborative divorce, the neutral financial professional is in charge of the required disclosure and does so at one hourly rate that is obviously much less expensive than two attorney hourly rates. The neutral financial professional allows each spouse to trust, but verify, before making financial decisions.

A FORUM FOR IDEAS TO REFORM U.S. FAMILY LAWS.

---

CALL TO ACTION

Many of you have reached out to Divorce Corp asking for specific ways you can help make a difference to correct the injustices of the family courts. We believe that there is a real opportunity to speak up and help right a wrong in this case Inguanzo vs. Rose.

---

STOP BY THE NEW FAMILY LAW REFORM WIKI, FAMILYPEDIA.

Become a member and add content or simply browse the Familypedia pages. This is a great place to share your personal experience or valuable information you have learned about family court.

Related articles

• Introducing The Foundation for the Child Victims of the Family Courts Radio Show
• This Little Girl’s Plea For Her Divorced Parents To Be Friends Brings Mom To Tears
• When Family Court Fails to Recognize Domestic Violence
• What MLK Taught Me About How to Be a Dad; Because judges don’t want a accurate reflection of what takes place in family hearings; the Commission on Access to Civil Justice of The Florida Bar and more…
• Miami-Dade Unveils New Children’s Courthouse
• Full List of Judges likely to be axed for corruption after Anas exposé
• Judges at war over divorce case privacy
• Ten Ten: Million Man March
• Struggle for justice leaves dad in limbo
• ‘We have been denied our chance for justice’ says dad of Huddersfield schoolboy stabbed in street after man charged with attack hanged in prison

ABC Family Law Blog

When most people think of divorce, they think of a courthouse battle. Florida’s court system pits husband versus wife, mother versus father, and what ensues is many times not too different from divorces depicted inWar of the Roses orKramer vs. Kramer.

But collaborative divorce is something different altogether.

View original post 449 more words